A debate about Nuclear Technology and free trades , or about what ever are Bush's concerns with the Aryan Nations or Iranian Nuclear energy development
2007-04-25 17:42:29 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not really. Both men are kind of morons if you ask me.
2007-04-25 17:45:59 · answer #1 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
First you should understand that Ahmadinejad has no power. He is only a figure head. The Presidency of Iran is a way for Khomeini to have his will enacted but without risking his own neck.
If you have ever watched an interview with Ahmadinejad you'll know that he simply avoids answering any and all questions and always changes the topic to perceived injustices against Muslims.
2007-04-25 17:51:48 · answer #2 · answered by professional student 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Buddy , don't use the word "Aryan" among non-Iranians, they might think that it's that racist word of Nazi Germans, they've no idea that it's means "noble" , totally they know a little about us , so it's better to select your words more carefully.
Neither TV nor face-to-face debate , talk , argument or anything you wanna call it , none of them can end anything !
Yankees want war with Iran, let them do that.... the history proved that "Har kas ba Iran dar oftaad var oftaad" ! believe me !
2007-04-28 09:27:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell yes I would, just so I could watch George W Bush kick his @$$, but admittedly that would be an awesome debate. "BUT" Ahmadinejad is a "NUTJOB" who is hellbent on annihilating Israel and America, he is in denial of the "HOLOCAUST" so would it be in our best interest's to give him the attention he is craving?? I think not.
P.S I see there are "A" lot of fool's onboard, who underestimate George W Bush, "BIG TIME", fool's, nothing more nothing less.
2007-04-25 17:57:34 · answer #4 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. Even if the President wasn't boy-cotting Ahmadinejad, I would be.
2007-04-25 17:46:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neither one has the intellect required to offer an effective debate, and neither one is gentleman enough to make the attempt. We are talking about two of the most ignorant sociopaths on the planet, after all.
Could we watch them mud wrestle? How about it? The French would be delighted to lend us a seemingly impartial referee, and we could get Condoleeza Rice and Hillary Clinton to announce the rounds.
2007-04-25 17:53:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes!
I'd like to hear bush's rhetoric and smart answers.
2007-04-25 17:55:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Monumental waste of time. Ahmadinejad has zero credibility.
2007-04-25 17:47:56 · answer #8 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I personally would love to see that. They both do not like each other...im surprised bush isn't going for it...He might be able to find some reason to invade Iran, and help build his oil tunnel from iraq to afganistan with his oil buddies...
2007-04-25 17:53:24 · answer #9 · answered by MekTekPhil 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No... what would be accomplished... Ahmadinejad would lie through his teeth anyhow... there could be no honest debate... it would be like talking to a far left lib....
2007-04-25 17:48:41 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I really want bush to see doubtfounded again
2007-04-25 21:00:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋