English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does Britain have a ground based nuclear deterent?
Does it have to ask the -U.S.-for the launch codes to fire them?
Does Britain have air launched nuke capability?



Please site references.



One last thing - Are the British under the impression that they don't need a nuclear arsenal - for protection.

Dont be silly.


Pop Quiz - For the little kids on here ( you know who Im talking about) - What is Mutually Assured Destruction, (MAD).

And.............does the system/ideology work?

2007-04-25 16:11:18 · 9 answers · asked by quarterback 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

Nope, not really....

But still, even with fancy defense patterns, even if only like five out of two hundred warheads get in, thats enough bring ANY country to its knees.

Oh, and I think Britain has sea-based nuclear capabilities....

Fictional war with the Americans?

New York, Los Angleles, Chicago, Huston, and Philadelphia, along with their 14 and a half million people allllllll gone.

2007-04-25 16:44:02 · answer #1 · answered by CanadianFundamentalist 6 · 1 0

If we assume that the Iranian diplomats are somewhat diplomats and not cutting-edge take care of attempting to grant weapons.....then the only difference I see is that the british have been infantrymen in contested waters and the iranians have been in a contested united states of america. With our government's checklist on torture, you're able to think of that there could be memories approximately any torture or loss of torture. actually, 2 iranians have been released suitable around the time that the warriors have been. there is no difference between an Iranian, an Israeli, or an American. we are each and every physique. some are solid, some are undesirable. All Iranians are actually not our enemies and its silly to think of of a finished united states of america is your enemy while its somewhat basically our government against their government.

2016-12-16 15:43:12 · answer #2 · answered by picart 4 · 0 0

NATO: britian enjoys the nuclear arsenal of the United States, France, and itself. Why would they want a ground based deterant? everyone knows where that is

2007-04-25 16:14:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

In today's B-B (Bush-Blair) relationship between America and Britain, it does not matter who has what, as all resources can be pooled together as soon as another false pretext in a dossier is presented to the world by either of them! Iran is in the pipeline!

2007-04-25 16:15:39 · answer #4 · answered by Sami V 7 · 2 1

Just that and the only reason that we need that is in case you Americans vote in yet another certifiable President. Just the ability to retaliate is enough to stop that sort of attack.

2007-04-25 18:48:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Russians.

2007-04-25 16:31:01 · answer #6 · answered by Scott Bull 6 · 0 1

I wouldn't worry about the Brits, I suggest worrying about rouge states like North Korea, China, Russia, Iran, etc......

2007-04-25 16:19:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Jack ****. The UK is totally dependent on the USA. That's why Blair has to agree with Bush

2007-04-25 18:11:25 · answer #8 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1 2

Communism is by no means "dead"! And communism will never be death as long as the religion that started it is still around!

2007-04-25 17:29:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers