what is tower of babel?

Question

i need the real story about tower of babel , can i?

Answer 1

It was a tower that early biblical people wanted to build after the great flood. God decided that people having one language and being able to work together was a bad thing so God scrambled the language and the tower was then called the tower of Babel.

Answer 2

We find in the story of Genesis 11:1-9 a discussion about the Tower of Babel. But these towers defnitely pre-date the writing of the story and had a definite Babylonian influence and origin. My closest guess would be that the Tower of Babel was the form of a ziggarut in which the worshipper would climb a lot of stairs before entering to sacrifice to the gods especially the main god ,Marduk. After engaging in the worship which may have consisted in sacred prostitution similiarly to the Caananite stories of Baal and Astarte, his consort, the man fulfilled his religious duties and set the woman free for fulfilling the worshipper's demands.

Answer 3

Genesis.. Chapter 11......

1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. 2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. 3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar. 4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. 5 And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children builded. 6 And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. 7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. 8 So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. 9 Therefore is the name of it called Babel (confusion); because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.



so...... people wanted to build a tower that reaches to Heaven.. God didnt like this.. and he scattered everone all over the world and gave them different languages so they couldn't communicate and build such a tower again.

Answer 4

I will be brief, sorry - basically it was man's challenge to God, and was struck down. I am sure that the more religious types can give you more of a blow by blow description. I only remember a bit from Sunday school. I am not very church-y.

It's about man's arrogance.

Answer 5

~The real story is that it is a myth created by early man to explain the development of the variety of languages present in biblical times. If you are looking for factual historical evidence or archeological proof, you are out of luck. As with all things biblical, you accept the myth on faith or burn in hell.

Answer 6

The best bet is that the "tower" was the stair-step building known as a "ziggurat", a structure that was seen as a sort of 'man-made mountain', and with a temple at the top. But what of the details?

Some take this story as pure mythology for the same reason others accept it in the most literal sense -- because they misunderstand its point, thinking it is meant as a precise account of the origin of all human languages. I DO believe what it is describing is something historical, but not necessarily one quick event.

It is absolutely critical to ANY understanding of this story in Genesis 11 to understand that it is partly a HUMOROUS story, in which the Hebrews were making a point about the the Babylonians.

------------------------

The very WORD "Babel" is important to understanding this story -- a story in which humorous (and mocking) wordplay plays a key role.

For starters, the name "BABEL" is actually just the Hebrew name for the city we call "Babylon".

In fact, in every biblical passage where this name appears, English Bibles translate it AS "Babylon", with the single exception of Genesis 11, in the story of the "Tower of Babel". (That is, the story could more accurately be called "the Tower of BABYLON".) But it seems that the name "Babel" was kept in this instance perhaps as a means of helping underline the point of the story.

The Hebrew name is simply an adaptation of the name the Babylonians themselves gave their own city. The ancient Babylonians along with the Assyrians spoke a Semitic language (that is, the same large language family that Hebrew belongs to ) which modern scholars usual call "Akkadian". In Akkadian the city's name was "Bab-ilu", which was said to mean "gate of the gods", that is, the place where heaven and earth met.

You can even see this theme in the Tower of Babel story. BUT the Hebrew story, in a very artful way, actually uses several wordplays --based on differences between Hebrew and Akkadian -- to mock the Babylonians and their lofty claims. (Note how the story mocks their efforts by showing us that the people do not reach their goal of 'reaching the heavens', since God has to "come DOWN" to take a look).

Now the FINAL wordplay of the story is that on the name of the city itself. In place of "gate of the gods", the writer suggests that the city's name means something like "Confusion". The Hebrew verb "balal" means "confuse" (the word used to refer to God "confusing" their tongues).

----------------------------

The question that remains is -- is the story desribing a specific historical event, something that happened over a period of time, or is it simply a mythological story told for entertainment and/or to answer the question "where did languages come from?" The conservative view has often been the first one -- that 'all at once' (in a day?) the builders were suddenly speaking different languages. But when you see that the story is very intentionally spoofing the Babylonians and their own boasts (something a Hebrew listener could not possibly have missed), it is a reasonable conservative reading to suggest that the story is meant to describe something that took a bit longer -- perhaps to describe the PROCESS of the disintegration (under divine Providence) of proud attempts at empire for human glory (to 'make a name for ourselves'), as different groups (with their different languages) fragmented. . . .

The result of "scattering" is language used elsewhere in the Bible to tell stories of JUDGMENT or exile, where God drives people out from their native land (from the Garden of Eden, to the exile of the Jews to Babylon). . . yet it is also suggested that God intends to bring GOOD from this scattering, that it becomes a way of fulfilling his own original command to humanity (laid out in Genesis 1), "Be fruitful and multiply, FILL THE EARTH. . . "

The Babel story, as many about the prominent Old Testament empires in Babylonia and Egypt, is also taken as 'emlematic', that is, it is an EXAMPLE of how people in general --every "kingdom/city or man"-- attempt to act and the sort of results they get (SOME success, but God does not allow their worst purposes to bear full fruit). In fact, echoes of this story are found in the story of Pharaoh in Exodus... another book that draws a contrast between the proud plans of HUMAN rulers, and GOD's plans.

Keep in mind that this story was not told in isolation. Later in the same chapter and next chapter of Genesis the narrative turns from telling about the vain HUMAN attempt to 'make a name' apart from God to tell the story of how GOD himself calls someone (Abram/Abraham) our from the very region of Babylon, a man from the line of "Shem" (meaning "name"!), and promises to make his NAME a blessing to all the nations. (The good news is that God WILL bless the nations, but it will be by HIS plan, not a human one.)

Answer 7

made in bible times simply built out of rebellion because they wanted to get to heaven and didnt want to seperate inthe world because God told the people to and so God cause different languages to come so there was confusion so yeah...

Answer 8

It's the Second Track, on Elton John's "Captain Fantastic" album. Other than that? You're on your own.

Answer 9

Historical and linguistic context
Image:Minaret Samarra Iraq.jpg
A U.S. soldier descends the Malwiya Tower in Samarra, Iraq.The Greek form of the name, Babylon, is from the native Akkadian Bāb-ilim, which means "Gate of the god". This correctly summarizes the religious purpose of the great temple towers (the ziggurats) of ancient Sumer (which many believe to be Biblical Shinar in modern southern Iraq). These huge, squared-off stepped temples were intended as gateways for the gods to come to earth, literal stairways to heaven. "Reaching heaven" is a common description in temple tower inscriptions. This is the type of structure referred to in the Biblical narrative, though artists and biblical scholars envisaged the tower in many different ways. Pieter Brueghel's influential portrayal is based on the Colosseum in Rome, while later conical depictions of the tower (as depicted in Doré's illustration) resemble much later Muslim towers observed by 19th century explorers in the area, notably the Minaret of Samarra. M. C. Escher depicts a more stylised geometrical structure in his woodcut representing the story.

Ziggurats are among the largest religious structures ever built. Some suppose the Biblical narrative is a reaction to the ancient Mesopotamian system of beliefs reflected in these impressive structures, beliefs that ruled the hearts and minds of some of the greatest civilizations of ancient times.

The Hebrew version of the name of the city and the tower, Bavel, is attributed in Gen. 11:9 to the verb balal, which means to confuse or confound in Hebrew. The ruins of the ancient city of Babylon can be found near the city of Hillah, in modern-day Iraq, in the province of Babil, approximately 60 miles south of Baghdad.

According to the documentary hypothesis, the passage derives from the Jahwist source, a writer whose work is full of puns, and like many of the other puns in the Jahwist text, the element of the story concerning the scattering of languages is thought by many to be a folk etymology for the name Babel, attached to a story of a collapsing tower.

Historical linguistics has long wrestled with the idea of a single original language. Attempts to identify this language with a currently existing language have been rejected by the academic community. This was the case with Hebrew, and with Basque (as proposed by Manuel de Larramendi). Yet the well-documented branching of languages from common ancestors (such as most current European languages from ancient Indo-European) points in the direction of a single ancestral language. The main issue of dispute is the date, which most modern scholars would put several thousand years before the traditional date for the demise of the Tower of Babel.

A large construction project in the ancient world might have used pressed labour from a diverse set of conquered or subject populations, and the domain of the empires covering Babylon would have contained some non-Semitic languages, such as Hurrian, Kassite, Sumerian, and Elamite, among others.


The Tower of Babel in the background of a depiction of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon by Martin Heemskerck.In Genesis 10, Babel is said to have formed part of Nimrod's kingdom. Although not specifically mentioned in the Bible that he ordered the tower to be built, Nimrod is often associated with its construction in other sources.

There is a Sumerian myth similar to that of the Tower of Babel, called Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta, where Enmerkar of Uruk is building a massive ziggurat in Eridu and demands a tribute of precious materials from Aratta for its construction, at one point reciting an incantation imploring the god Enki to restore (or in Kramer's translation, to disrupt) the linguistic unity of the inhabited regions -- named as Shubur, Hamazi, Sumer, Uri-ki (the region around Akkad), and the Martu land.

One recent theory first advanced by David Rohl associates Nimrod, the hunter, builder of Erech and Babel, with Enmerkar (i.e., Enmer the Hunter) king of Uruk, also said to have been the first builder of the Eridu temple. (Amar-Sin (c. 2046-2037 BC), third monarch of the Third Dynasty of Ur, later attempted to complete the Eridu ziggurat.) This theory proposes that the actual remains of the Tower of Babel are in fact the much older ruins of the ziggurat of Eridu, just south of Ur, rather than those of Babylon, where the story was later transposed. Among the reasons for this association are the larger size of the ruins, the older age of the ruins, and the fact that one title of Eridu was NUN.KI ("mighty place"), which later became a title of Babylon. Both cities also had temples called the E-Sagila.

Traditionally, the peoples listed in Chapter 10 of Genesis (the Table of Nations) are understood to have been scattered over the face of the earth from Shinar only after the abandonment of The Tower, which follows as an explanation of this cultural diversity. Some, however, see an internal contradiction between the mention already in Genesis 10:5 that "From these the maritime peoples spread out into their territories by their clans within their nations, each with his own language" and the subsequent Babel story, which begins "Now the entire earth was of one language and uniform words" (Genesis 11:1). Others answer this claim with the fact Genesis is listing the descendants of Noah's son Japheth, not stating a time period as much as referring to separate cultures. They claim that there is no reason to presuppose these descendants had gotten their own languages prior to the Tower's construction.


[edit] Etemenanki: the ziggurat of Babylon
Main article: Etemenanki

Construction of the Tower of Babel in the Maciejowski BibleIn 440 BC Herodotus wrote:

Babylon's outer wall is the main defence of the city. There is, however, a second inner wall, of less thickness than the first, but very little inferior to it in strength. The center of each division of the town was occupied by a fortress. In the one stood the palace of the kings, surrounded by a wall of great strength and size: in the other was the sacred precinct of Jupiter (Zeus) Belus, a square enclosure two furlongs [402 m] each way, with gates of solid brass; which was also remaining in my time. In the middle of the precinct there was a tower of solid masonry, a furlong [201 m] in length and breadth, upon which was raised a second tower, and on that a third, and so on up to eight. The ascent to the top is on the outside, by a path which winds round all the towers. When one is about half-way up, one finds a resting-place and seats, where persons are wont to sit some time on their way to the summit. On the topmost tower there is a spacious temple, and inside the temple stands a couch of unusual size, richly adorned, with a golden table by its side. There is no statue of any kind set up in the place, nor is the chamber occupied of nights by any one but a single native woman, who, as the Chaldeans, the priests of this god, affirm, is chosen for himself by the deity out of all the women of the land.

This Tower of Jupiter Belus is believed to refer to the Akkadian god Bel, whose name has been hellenised by Herodotus to Zeus Belus. It is likely that it corresponds to the giant ziggurat to Marduk (Etemenanki), an ancient ziggurat which was abandoned, falling into ruin due to earthquakes, and lightning damaging the clay. This huge ziggurat, and its downfall is thought by many academics to have inspired the story of the Tower of Babel. However, it would also fit nicely into the Biblical narrative — providing some archaeological support for the story. More evidence can be gleaned from what King Nebuchadnezzar inscribed on the ruins of this ziggurat.

In 570s BC, Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon, seeking to restore the ziggurat, wrote of its ruinous state,

A former king built [the Temple of the Seven Lights of the Earth, but he did not complete its head. Since a remote time, people had abandoned it, without order expressing their words. Since that time earthquakes and lightning had dispersed its sun-dried clay; the bricks of the casing had split, and the earth of the interior had been scattered in heaps. Merodach, the great lord, excited my mind to repair this building. I did not change the site, nor did I take away the foundation stone ? as it had been in former times. So I founded it, I made it; as it had been in ancient days, I so exalted the summit.


[edit] In other sources

[edit] Destruction
It is not mentioned in the Genesis account that God directly destroyed the tower; however, the accounts in the Book of Jubilees, Cornelius Alexander (frag. 10), Abydenus (frags. 5 and 6), Josephus (Antiquities 1.4.3), and the Sibylline Oracles (iii. 117-129) do state the tradition that God overturned the tower with a great wind.


[edit] Jubilees

Tower of Babel as envisioned by Athanasius Kircher.The Book of Jubilees, known to have been in use between at least 200 BC and 90 AD, contains one of the most detailed accounts found anywhere of the Tower.

And they began to build, and in the fourth week they made brick with fire, and the bricks served them for stone, and the clay with which they cemented them together was asphalt which comes out of the sea, and out of the fountains of water in the land of Shinar. And they built it: forty and three years were they building it; its breadth was 203 bricks, and the height [of a brick] was the third of one; its height amounted to 5433 cubits and 2 palms, and [the extent of one wall was] thirteen stades [and of the other thirty stades].(Jubilees 10:20-21, Charles' 1913 translation)


[edit] Midrash
Rabbinic literature offers many different accounts of other causes for building the Tower of Babel, and of the intentions of its builders. It was regarded in the Mishnah as a rebellion against God. Some later midrash record that the builders of the Tower, called "the generation of secession" in the Jewish sources, said: "God has no right to choose the upper world for Himself, and to leave the lower world to us; therefore we will build us a tower, with an idol on the top holding a sword, so that it may appear as if it intended to war with God" (Gen. R. xxxviii. 7; Tan., ed. Buber, Noah, xxvii. et seq.).

The building of the Tower was meant to bid defiance not only to God, but also to Abraham, who exhorted the builders to reverence. The passage mentions that the builders spoke sharp words against God, not cited in the Bible, saying that once every 1,656 years, heaven tottered so that the water poured down upon the earth, therefore they would support it by columns that there might not be another deluge (Gen. R. l.c.; Tan. l.c.; similarly Josephus, "Ant." i. 4, § 2).

Some among that sinful generation even wanted to war against God in heaven (Talmud Sanhedrin 109a.) They were encouraged in this wild undertaking by the notion that arrows which they shot into the sky fell back dripping with blood, so that the people really believed that they could wage war against the inhabitants of the heavens (Sefer ha-Yashar, Noah, ed. Leghorn, 12b). According to Josephus and Midrash Pirke R. El. xxiv., it was mainly Nimrod who persuaded his contemporaries to build the Tower, while other rabbinical sources assert, on the contrary, that Nimrod separated from the builders.


[edit] Apocalypse of Baruch
The Third Apocalypse of Baruch, known only from Greek and Slavonic copies, seems to allude to the Tower, and may be consistent with Jewish tradition. In it, Baruch is first taken (in a vision) to see the resting place of the souls of "those who built the tower of strife against God, and the Lord banished them." Next he is shown another place, and there, occupying the form of dogs,

Those who gave counsel to build the tower, for they whom thou seest drove forth multitudes of both men and women, to make bricks; among whom, a woman making bricks was not allowed to be released in the hour of child-birth, but brought forth while she was making bricks, and carried her child in her apron, and continued to make bricks. And the Lord appeared to them and confused their speech, when they had built the tower to the height of four hundred and sixty-three cubits. And they took a gimlet, and sought to pierce the heavens, saying, Let us see (whether) the heaven is made of clay, or of brass, or of iron. When God saw this He did not permit them, but smote them with blindness and confusion of speech, and rendered them as thou seest. (Greek Apocalypse of Baruch, 3:5-8)


[edit] Qur'an and Islamic traditions
Though not mentioned by name, the Qur'an has a story with similarities to the Biblical story of the Tower of Babel, though set in the Egypt of Moses. In Suras 28:38 and 40:36-37 Pharaoh asks Haman to build him a clay tower so that he can mount up to heaven and confront the God of Moses.

Another story in Sura 2:102 mentions the name of Babil, but gives few additional details about it. However, the tale appears more fully in the writings of Yaqut (i, 448 f.) and the Lisan el-'Arab (xiii. 72), but without the tower: mankind were swept together by winds into the plain that was afterwards called "Babil", where they were assigned their separate languages by Allah, and were then scattered again in the same way.

In the History of the Prophets and Kings by the 9th century Muslim historian al-Tabari, a fuller version is given: Nimrod has the tower built in Babil, Allah destroys it, and the language of mankind, formerly Syriac, is then confused into 72 languages. Another Muslim historian of the 13th century, Abu al-Fida relates the same story, adding that the patriarch Eber (an ancestor of Abraham) was allowed to keep the original tongue, (Hebrew in this case ??), the language of Soltan Sulaiman (the bird-language: KUSHANI, see wife of Moses), because he would not partake in the building.


[edit] Other traditions
Various traditions similar to that of the tower of Babel are found in Central America. One holds that Xelhua, one of the seven giants rescued from the deluge, built the Great Pyramid of Cholula in order to storm Heaven. The gods destroyed it with fire and confounded the language of the builders. The Dominican friar Diego Duran (1537-1588) reported hearing this account from a hundred-year-old priest at Cholula, shortly after the conquest of Mexico.

Another story, attributed by the native historian Don Ferdinand d'Alva Ixtilxochitl (c. 1565-1648) to the ancient Toltecs, states that after men had multiplied following a great deluge, they erected a tall zacuali or tower, to preserve themselves in the event of a second deluge. However, their languages were confounded and they went to separate parts of the earth.

Still another story, attributed to the Tohono O'odham Indians, holds that Montezuma escaped a great flood, then became wicked and attempted to build a house reaching to heaven, but the Great Spirit destroyed it with thunderbolts. (Bancroft, vol. 3, p.76; also in History of Arizona)

Traces of a somewhat similar story have also been reported among the Tharus of Nepal and northern India (Report of the Census of Bengal, 1872, p. 160); and according to Dr Livingstone, the Africans whom he met living near Lake Ngami in 1879 had such a tradition, but with the builders' heads getting "cracked by the fall of the scaffolding" (Missionary Travels, chap. 26)

The Estonian myth of " the Cooking of Languages " (Kohl, Reisen in die 'Ostseeprovinzen, ii. 251-255) has also been compared.


[edit] Height of the tower
The height of the tower is largely a matter of speculation, but since the tower symbolically can be considered a precursor to humankind's desire to build tall structures throughout history, its height is a significant aspect of it. The tower commissioned by Nebuchadnezzar in about 560 BC in the form of an eight-level ziggurat is believed by historians to have been about 100 meters (328 feet) in height.

The narrative in the book of Genesis does not mention how tall the Biblical tower was, and it has traditionally not been much of a subject of debate. There are, however, relevant extra-canonical sources. The Book of Jubilees mentions the tower's height as being 5433 cubits and 2 palms (8,150 feet, 2,484 meters high), or nearly 2.5 kilometers, several times taller than the tallest modern structures. The Third Apocalypse of Baruch mentions that the 'tower of strife' reached a height of 463 cubits (694 feet and 6 inches, 212 meters high), taller than any other structure built in the ancient world including the Pyramid of Cheops in Giza, Egypt, and taller than any structure built in human history until the construction of the Eiffel Tower in 1889.

Gregory of Tours (I, 6) writing ca. 594, quotes the earlier historian Orosius (ca. 417) as saying the tower was "laid out foursquare on a very level plain. Its wall, made of baked brick cemented with pitch, is fifty cubits wide, two hundred high, and four hundred and seventy stades in circumference. A stade contains five agripennes. Twenty-five gates are situated on each side, which make in all one hundred. The doors of these gates, which are of wonderful size, are cast in bronze. The same historian [Orosius] tells many other tales of this city, and says: 'Although such was the glory of its building still it was conquered and destroyed.'"

The 14th century traveler John Mandeville also included an account of the tower, and reported that its height had been 64 furlongs (= 8 miles), according to the local inhabitants.

The 17th century historian Verstegan provides yet another figure - quoting Isidore (probably St. Isidore of Seville) he says that the tower was 5164 paces high, about 7.6 kilometers, and quoting Josephus that the tower was wider than it was high, more like a mountain than a tower. He also quotes unnamed authors who say that the spiral path was so wide that it contained lodgings for workers and animals, and other authors who claim that the path was wide enough to have fields for growing grain for the animals used in the construction.