English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Q: Why does Bush's Attorney General (a proving liar) still have a job?

A: Clinton kept Reno on after she fabricated child molestation charges in Waco--then slaughtered them to cover it up. As far as liars and crooks go: ADMINISTRATION RECORDS SET - The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance - Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates ** - Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation - Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify - Most number of witnesses to die suddenly - First president sued for sexual harassment. - First president accused of rape. - First first lady to come under criminal investigation - Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case - First president to establish a legal defense fund. - Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions - Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad

2007-04-25 12:40:02 · 10 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government Government

CRIME STATS - Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47 - Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33 - Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61 - Number of imprisonments: 14 - Number of congressional witnesses who have pled the 5th Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 124 And traitors.......hmmm, who was that who sold out to the Chinese?

Facts--so why was it a violation? YA still hasn't responded.

2007-04-25 12:40:50 · update #1

Awesome John Boy--thank you--they have never responded to me--I will try your email addy --THANKS!

2007-04-25 12:53:44 · update #2

10 answers

If you read the guidelines, it is clear, any answer or question is in violation of the guidelines. Isn't that neat.

I have a friend of a friend who works there, he says, almost all violations are the result of a complaint, 99.99%.

Take a look at who asked the question first, most often it is them, then look at the other lunatics who answered. You will find who is complaining. Most often they have multiple IDs, because they are often cancelled quite quickly. Look for those who do not answer questions and have less than 500 points.

Tell us who you think it is.

Great answer by the way.

2007-04-25 13:42:05 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1 0

All it takes is for one person to flag it and it's done, I'm not sure the initialy review process is really very thorough.

Try this, if you feel the violation was unjust you can report it here:

http://messages.answers.yahoo.com/answers/forumview?bn=SEA-ViolationsNotice

Under the "Wrongful Violations & Suspensions" Topic.

I have reported my unfair violations and had the points returned to my account.
If they uphold the violation, they atleast give you an explaination as to what you did wrong.

Hope this helps!!!

2007-04-25 12:51:12 · answer #2 · answered by John Boy 4 · 2 0

Most likely some liberal at Yahoo didn't like the answer
because it was RIGHT but they hate Bush and loved
BC soooo much it pissed them off

2007-04-25 14:53:07 · answer #3 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 1 0

Well it appears your question was more of a speech than a query.

2007-04-25 20:19:05 · answer #4 · answered by Ish Var Lan Salinger 7 · 0 0

All someone has to do is whine and report you, and the mindless yahoo's violate you regardless!

2007-04-25 12:47:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

They have done that to me as well. Nice question by the way.

2007-04-25 12:44:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Because some soviet lib (like neddie) didn't like your answer.

2007-04-25 12:48:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

i see nothing wrong with this

2007-04-25 12:50:05 · answer #8 · answered by hardbringer26 3 · 1 0

perhaps they have updated the information highway and don't want to rehash lame accusations made 10 years ago..

2007-04-25 12:44:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

probably some political garbage, maybe you put some explicit language in there or something. i dunno.

2007-04-25 12:48:30 · answer #10 · answered by blah 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers