English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What are some plausible ways in which the issue of Income Inequality in the US can be eliminated (to an extent)? ex. Should the tax system be altered, how so?, can this problem be solved through the negative tax, workfare, or cash transfer programs?

2007-04-25 12:24:05 · 6 answers · asked by ? 1 in Social Science Economics

I did not mean income inequality should be eliminated, as I understand that it is highly needed in a capitalistic society and competition is key! If you look closely… I said the “Issue”, meaning the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer… it’s not right for 20% of the population to control almost half of the total GDP… perhaps “income inequality” is not the greatest title!

2007-04-25 12:36:33 · update #1

6 answers

Historically, income inequality in the U.S. has been positively related to immigration and negatively related to inflation and the strength of the unions.

Tax system could potentially be altered to reduce the income inequality somewhat (more progressive income taxation, introduction of wealth taxes, entitlements for low-income families with children, etc.), but it any of these measures would have at least some negative consequences. Entitlements for low-income families with children have been tried before and turned out to be an incentive to produce more (poorly reared) children rather than take better care of children families already have. More progressive income taxation and wealth taxes would not have much of a negative short-term effect, but will lead to slower capital accumulation in the long-run. Back in 1981, Laurence Kotlikoff and Lawrence Summers published a paper (Kotlikoff, Laurence J. and Summers, Lawrence H. "The Role of Intergenerational Transfers in Aggregate Capital Accumulation." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No. 4, (August 1981), pp. 706-732.) which showed that captal accumulation happens largely through inheritance. Smaller fortunes today, therefore, could easily lead to the decrease in the number of the proverbial "good jobs" in twenty or thirty years. One can even argue that the "junk job explosion" of today is directly related to income inequality reaching its historic low in 1970s...

2007-04-25 13:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by NC 7 · 2 0

Why would you want to eliminate income inequality? Do you think it is fair that people who take risks and work hard get no more than someone who sits around doing nothing? We would deteriorate the motive for work if nobody got more or less than anyone else. The productivity of our society would disappear and EVERYONE would be worse off.

2007-04-25 19:29:25 · answer #2 · answered by econgal 5 · 2 0

First things first. Do away with unions or unionize everything. Right now it's like having cars and pedestrians trying to use the highway at the same time and it's not working worth a crap.

2007-04-25 19:34:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

is it right to strive for income inequality??? are you meaning that a brain surgeon would get paid comparable wages to the cafeteria lady? what motivation would there be for anyone to improve their education etc?

2007-04-25 19:28:09 · answer #4 · answered by casw1 4 · 1 0

You're supporting communism. Wake up.

2007-04-25 19:34:14 · answer #5 · answered by frozen555 5 · 0 0

education

2007-04-25 19:56:47 · answer #6 · answered by Allie C 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers