Does it aggrevate Liberals that Bush never lashes back?

Question

Bush has always kept the high road when under attack. Almost Jesus like.

Answer 1

I love Bush for this because it pisses off liberals to no ends. He could care less what they think. He is doing what HE thinks is right and liberals are doing what THEY think will get them elected. In 2002, it was war, and now it is cut and run.

Answer 2

That's a bit of a stretch, Sparky.

"almost like Jesus."

a...yah.

No, what's aggravating is the adolescent level of postings in this forum. Name calling. Slurs. Epithets.

Real mature, intelligent stuff.

People post pure crap, and then get all offended when someone responds in kind.

Answer 3

If anyone who still believes the official version of the events of 9/11, can read Ed-Mike's answer to this question, (all the way through), and still not see how ridiculous said official version really is, then you must have a screw ,or two, or three, or four, loose somewhere. *sm*

Answer 4

I expect a President to leave most of the attacks on political opponents to minions, and control his temper. A president who is not capable of controlling himself in public would embarrass me and the country, so I am not aggravated.

Answer 5

I can see how you would compare Bush to Jesus. Jesus turned water into wine, feed the poor, healed the sick and preached forgiveness and love for thy neighbor. Bush started a war, wants to take away health care from the poor and wants to cut welfare. Yeah, they sound a lot alike.

Answer 6

have Republicans ever actually in their lives listened to Bush...

"if you're not with us you're against us"... and he's said this varrying ways, many different times, basically calling everyone that doesn't agree with him terrorists...

he does this weekly, if not more?

he's also lashed out at Pelosi and Harry Reid recently?

so, just what are you talking about? please clarify?

he has also said Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, there were no WMD, global warming is real and much more too...

Answer 7

Almost Jesus like? Now you sound like him AND you're insulting Jesus. Jesus would NEVER have gotten the US into this impossible fiasco called the Iraq war.
Bush doesn't lash back because he doesn't have the I.Q. to formulate answers.

Answer 8

I have never lashed out at president Bush, making it physically and logically impossible for him to lash back at me.

So much for sweeping generalizations.

Answer 9

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, yeah higher road I get it you must mean high on coke. lol your funny man.
Who is this Jesus guy? His Mexican Dealer perhaps?

You want facts about 911 being an inside job??
Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with plastic box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, out smarted the CIA, FBI, NSA, FAA, The Pentagon, and our Multi Trillion Dollar High Tech Military by crashing 4 planes without any intervention.

The following is fact and is irrefutable:

FACT: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI web site. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care if we catch him or not.

FACT: There are hundreds of televised claims from the morning of the attacks saying that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, news reporters, security guards, employees of the WTC and civilians.

FACT: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a concrete and steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically at free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as DEMOLITION. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7.

FACT: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence and malpractice in the history of forensics.

FACT: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.

FACT: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24 A.M, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Shanksville Penn. NORAD has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. The Bush Administration changed their story several times. We must also look at the fact that President Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the morning of the attacks.

FACT: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families and the loss of their loved ones.

FACT: No one has been fired for the failures of 9/11.

FACT: Right before the attack a spike in “put options” on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines increased dramatically and was never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates people knew in advance. Why didn’t the FBI check out these leads?

FACT: In August 6, 2001 A Public Daily Briefing Memo that was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US was brought forward. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?

FACT: When the United States is under attack the first measure is to secure the President.
The entire nation knew 2 weeks in advance that President Bush would be at Booker Elementary Grade School. Why did his body guards and secret service men let him remain at this location for 20 minutes after the attack? Holding the book “My Pet Goat” upside down while he tried to address a bunch of 5th grade students?

The bottom line is - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Immediately! Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted. Since they determined the conclusion prematurely. Do you understand?

If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or an FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down, failed to requisition intervention or just plain messed up that day?

To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.

More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.

Go ahead and give this a thumbs down if your Patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.

So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your Cheap Patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a President and a Government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for Accountability, Truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 victims, their families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer the loss of their loved ones.

Peace, may the truth be brought forward and the guilty be brought to justice.

Answer 10

I don't know about the terrorist supporting liberals.
But Bush really irritates me by letting the Democrats lie, lie, and lie, without striking back.