English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Instead of considering how their decisions TODAY will impact generations of the future- such as their ignorance regarding the environment.

2007-04-25 10:52:09 · 18 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Do you live under a rock, pimpy? Read the newspaper, for goodness sake!

2007-04-25 10:58:57 · update #1

18 answers

They don't care. They think Jesus is coming to save them soon so why should they care about the environment or the massive deficit they are leaving for their children?

2007-04-25 10:55:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 6

I don't know Thank you for saying SOME. That does make a difference. I have great concern for my children's futures and their children's, once they have them. I have a hard time being constantly bombard with rich people telling me that I need to conserve. That I need to do with out so that the future can be salvageable for future generations. Then I see news footage of those same people flying all over the world on lavish vacations. Living in wondrously huge homes with Olympic size swimming pools. And I wonder at the thought process. Is there really a need to conserve if the folks that are telling me to are not.

2007-04-25 18:15:23 · answer #2 · answered by Mother 6 · 0 0

The environment goes beyond certain political parties. The environment goes beyond political parties in the United States. If your so concerned about the environment, then make it a world problem, not some political problem where you think it's right to point fingers at the party you don't agree with.

2007-04-25 17:57:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

This is one disagreement I do have with Republicans. I know global warming is exaggerated, but we still need to do a better job at protecting the environment. We live here, we clean it up.

2007-04-25 17:59:13 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel 6 · 2 0

Why are SOME democrats only concerned about their own lifetime?
There, works both ways. Imagine that!

2007-04-25 17:55:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

because when we elected a liberal president who said...quoting...i feel your pain(clinton) look what we got...

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
my point is simple. im concerned about my lifetime as it seems patently obvious that not emphasising conservative control to lead us into our childrens, as exemplified above, may infact ELIMINATE THE POSSIBILITY OF THEIR BEING A NEXT GENERATION.
there is a wage to this type of liberal behavior when preaching responsibility and caring and doing something else and it certainly isnt prosperity and well being.

2007-04-25 17:58:57 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 0

Because we have problems of yesterday and today that still need solving before we can solve the ones of tomorrow!

2007-04-25 17:55:59 · answer #7 · answered by TJ815 4 · 0 0

Why don't Dems donate more money. Republicans far outpace them.

Very hypocritical of Dems.

2007-04-25 17:56:13 · answer #8 · answered by Janey 1 · 2 0

True of most people, they are only concerned about their own bottom line.

2007-04-25 18:26:10 · answer #9 · answered by applecrisp 6 · 0 0

same reason Dems have been doing it for years....look who was at the helm when all the issuing of bonds to borrow money from Social Security was going on...dems of course....

2007-04-25 17:58:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Two words...Teddy Kennedy

2007-04-25 18:11:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers