2007-04-25 09:19:15 · 8 answers · asked by Andy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
yes..as long as 1 person knows they are being recorded..a third party cannot tape them but one of the two can...thats Federal
2007-04-25 09:22:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Technically yes. Federal law outweighs local jurisdictions, so that is what applies.
You must inform the person that you are recording the conversation if you want that conversation to be admissible in any court of law. But you don't need their permission to do so. They have the option of hanging up or continuing the conversation.
2007-04-25 09:41:58 · answer #2 · answered by Enchanted 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is federal law. You must inform the person you are recording on have a beep sound every 15 seconds, but you dont need thier permission, just informing them
2007-04-25 09:27:12 · answer #3 · answered by skcs11 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you must tell that your recording them, the accept ion is a court ordered wirer tap.
2007-04-25 09:27:28 · answer #4 · answered by zipper 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they can. As long as one party to the conversation consents, it's OK.
2007-04-25 09:25:22 · answer #5 · answered by Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure, it incredibly is criminal to checklist a communique as long as you're area of the communique,which ability you are able to not checklist somebody speaking to somebody else devoid of there permission except you're in touch interior the communique!!
2016-11-27 20:18:40 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends if is in the best interest of you I guess shouldn't be illegal.
2007-04-25 09:24:48 · answer #7 · answered by nena_en_austin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as long as it leeds to get rid of terror ,why should I refuse .?
2007-04-25 09:32:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋