Even though I voted for him in 2000, but not in 2004. I can no longer give him my support. He seems to be more concerned about big companies profits than what's good for America. His insistence that we invade Iraq was about as stupid as it gets.
2007-04-25 09:14:29 · 16 answers · asked by sparks 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He wasn't credible before he even took his forst oath as president. I always thought ... is this the best the Republicans can come up with .... a man who can't even formulate an intelligent sentence as leader of the free world. It speaks volumes on the Republican party that they would rally around such a poor excuse for a leader without question or conscience.
The answer is simple ... he isn't the leader of the free world. He's the puppet of those who would hijack our country for their own self-serving causes and take away our freedoms in the process.
2007-04-25 10:02:55 · answer #1 · answered by HillBillieNot 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could not agree more. His credibility has dimished severly and in a very short period of time. It is actually scary to think that his approval rating is the lowest ever. We will never really know what is going on in Washington as our government seems to feel like we are children and should not be told the honest truth about anything because we could not handle it. I am tired of being lied to and cheated. I feel that our government is more concerned about stuffing their pockets than doing what is best for the American people. If this continues-----------GOD BE WITH US!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-04-25 16:22:51 · answer #2 · answered by golfnuttoday 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You mean he was once credible? He was the same man in 2000 and 2004 when you voted for him. He hasn't changed...you've wised up.
2007-04-25 16:22:21 · answer #3 · answered by prekinpdx 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Bush and Cheney have no credibility any longer. It is almost impossible to believe anything that comes out of either of their mouths.
2007-04-25 17:14:43 · answer #4 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whew...I'm glad we so wholeheartedly disagree with each other on this one. God knows I'd NEVER want to be associated with anyone that used the word "creditable" instead of "credible".
You expect people to take you seriously with that glaring lack of knowledge of the English language? All I know is this...anyone taking political advise from you gets what they deserve!
YOUR "creditability" is nil, buddy!
2007-04-25 16:24:03 · answer #5 · answered by lakerfan93449 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I support him
Don't forget that both Republicans and Democrats agreed to go to war. We all had the same info and we didn't find out that our sources were wrong till later.
Iraq would probably be a success story if the Iraq people wouldn't kill their own. It's a unofficial civil war that we are dealing with on top of all that Al-Qaeda has done.
We say we want to fight Al-Qaeda...well their active in Iraq.
2007-04-25 16:21:18 · answer #6 · answered by Its Me 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
he lost his credibility when he chose to respond to the 9/11 attack by Saudi Arabia, Iran & Yemen by invading Iraq.
2007-04-25 16:19:54 · answer #7 · answered by Alan S 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No.
But Pelosi and Reid are.
Big Companies Provide Employments and Salary. What do Democrats give you?
2007-04-25 16:19:39 · answer #8 · answered by Samm 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Common sense is such a great thought process--stick with it.
2007-04-25 16:19:33 · answer #9 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think he lost his credibility a long time ago.
2007-04-25 16:19:16 · answer #10 · answered by Matt G 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋