English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Because abortion is a constitutional right. Don't you remember the founding fathers saying "The ability to crush a baby's skull while in the womb shall not be infringed upon" ?

And they never mentioned anything about saying we should be allowed to own guns.

Isn't that right libs?

Oh wait... :-\

2007-04-25 10:17:39 · answer #1 · answered by Edward 5 · 1 2

Because Abortion is NOT murder like white trash so desperately claim it to be.

1. A fetus is NOT a child and a fetus is NOT a human being. It is a part of the female's body until it is carried to term and can live outside the human body. Until then, it is medically, little more than a parasite and it is a possession of that woman. If a lung or kidney or even a tonsil is brought out of a human being, it is a living human organism and will die outside the human body eventually. Letting a tonsil die is not murder. Removing a fetus is not murder either.

2. A woman's body is NOT the property of the superstitious dogma of obsolete objective moralists.

3. Life is NOT sacred. Human life is NOT sacred. If it was, hand guns and the death penalty would be illegal.Wars would definitely not be started by slacker conservatives looking for a way to feel macho while shedding other people's blood.

4. Human life does not start at conception. Human life starts, individually, as sperm and eggs - gametes which ARE alive, but are disposed of every month through menstrual cycles for females or either nocturnal emissions or masturbation for males. So any boy who has had a wet dream or any girl who has had more than one period is, by the pro-life definition, a serial killer. Pro-lifers tend to move the start of human life to conception out of convenience rather than reality.

5. In nature, animals that don't want their children either eat them or abandon them in the wild.

2007-04-25 08:49:18 · answer #2 · answered by Zenrage 3 · 3 1

you're posting those statistics as though they imply something. ninety 3% of abortions have not got something to do with rape, incest or wellbeing damaging aspects. So? no person ever stated that maximum human beings of abortions could do with rape, incest or wellbeing damaging aspects. eighty 5% of abortions are executed on single women folk and 50% on women folk below 25. Are the two of those data quite an excellent ask your self to you? A single woman below 25 is the least in all likelihood to be waiting to have adequate funds to have a new child. 36% of abortions are executed on women folk who've had abortions. lower back, so? you haven't any longer even tried to describe why it quite is suitable. the nice and cozy button is that the state has no business enterprise forcing a woman to proceed a being pregnant opposed to her will. She has to choose for base on each and each of the situations in her existence no remember if or no longer she could proceed the being pregnant. you certainly at the instant cannot choose for which motives are valid or to 2nd wager the determination of girls folk you will in no way even meet.

2016-12-23 05:55:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

How can any Christian defend Bush and his actions over the last 6 years?

As for "defending abortion", I don't. I defend the right of a woman to make that difficult decision rather than those on the right wing who clearly could care less about the woman.

2007-04-25 08:40:15 · answer #4 · answered by brian2412 7 · 3 2

Oh my god! Show me the page in the bible that says: "do not abort". I know what you're going to say now: "do not murder" is in the bible. Well abortion is not murder. It has never been medically proven that the child feels anything before the 4th month. I don't think so many countries would allow abortion if it was ethically wrong.No I have never aborted and never will, but everyone has the right to decide over their own body without religious nutters telling them what's right or wrong.

2007-04-25 09:06:20 · answer #5 · answered by jennifer484 5 · 1 1

I am a liberal, pro-choice, and a Christian. I attend church every Sunday. Abortion is not killing a baby its killing an embryo which is not a living baby. How are you a christian and defend Bush's lie based war? How do you defend the killing of innocent Iraqi civilians and innocent American troops?

2007-04-25 11:58:00 · answer #6 · answered by gaahgasjhagshjkgahksjaghjks 2 · 2 1

Because not ALL liberals believe in in abortion. I am a converted liberal that IS a Christian and is AGAINST abortion. I am a liberal based on my stance on the economy and education.

2007-04-25 08:41:46 · answer #7 · answered by lsr 2 · 3 0

one again a rash oversimplification of the truth.
not all liberals are pro abortion. not all liberals are atheists.
that's just the general stance of the left
i bet if you were raped and then the pregnacy was high risk youd have no quawms about having your rapists baby that could kill you
i wish life was black and white, as you see it, but its not.
sorry
i am not pro abortion. i am pro not giving a fyck becuase its not my life and i have NO RIGHT to tell anyone else what they can and cant do
killing a fetus is not ok, but killing a man or woman in responce to their crimes is? wheres the pro life now? wheres the pro life when you sent thousands of troops to die in iraq

2007-04-25 08:45:04 · answer #8 · answered by Kevy 7 · 1 1

How can Conservatists claim to be Christain when all they like to do is speak the word, but not live it. WHat off, tolarance, love thy neighbor,, turn the other cheek. Liberals are more into the actions then conseratives.

2007-04-25 08:46:57 · answer #9 · answered by Doctor Robotnik 3 · 2 1

Guess what: I'm Christian. I'm pro-life. (Which is why I am a pacifist.) Finally, I'm not God so it's not my duty to pass judgement on you.

You tell me... how can the so-called "Religious Right" in this country defend capital punishment but not a woman's choice?

2007-04-25 08:46:51 · answer #10 · answered by Sangria 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers