Fair and afraid????
2007-04-25 07:05:06 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
This article seems to have reported the incident.
2007-04-25 07:15:49 · answer #1 · answered by The man 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You must not be watching because I just saw a report on this yesterday AND today on Fox. You're obviously making a judgment without knowing the truth. And ... friendly fire is something the military tries to keep out of the limelight because it is a cold fact of war, but people who don't understand war think it should be eliminated. It's as impossible to eliminate it as it is to eliminate any kind of collateral damage. War is hell, it's violent, but sometimes it's necessary. So what do you do when someone attacks you? Just lie down and play dead? Yeah, that's the rhymes with wussy answer.
2007-04-25 14:13:30 · answer #2 · answered by chumley 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think - they are covering lot of things up. Afterall they are Right Wings TV (screaming and complaining about everything 24/7)
2007-04-25 14:13:01 · answer #3 · answered by Be-hive Baaaby 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Probably because the pentagon can't make up their minds whether or not Tillman was killed by rebels or friendly fire. First it's one then it's another.
2007-04-25 14:10:21 · answer #4 · answered by sicilia 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think there sould be a story. The man is dead. Why do we need to know how it happened, it will not bring him back. I would have been ordered if it was my brother and left it at that.
2007-04-25 14:24:11 · answer #5 · answered by Boomrat 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its very difficult covering a story when you have tons of egg on your face!
2007-04-25 14:09:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'm in favor of Jim J's answer.
2007-04-25 14:22:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it doesn't fit their agenda...
2007-04-25 18:21:10 · answer #8 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they don't have the 'nads'?
2007-04-25 14:23:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋