2007-04-25 00:53:59 · 10 answers · asked by david 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
NO,
sorry for the short answer, but the truth is often like that.
2007-04-26 04:36:56 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there was ANY possiblity that Pelosi could be prosecuted for ANY thing, the Bush administration, which controls the Justice Dept. more tightly than any administration ever has, would have started the wheels in motion. The Bushies fired 8 US Attorneys who would not comply with their requests to prosecute Democratic politicians. This means of course, that the US Attorneys (federal prosecutors) now in office would not hesitate to file charges against a Democrat if there was just a "bit of evidence".
2007-04-25 08:08:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Proving the negative? The stuff of fools without a leg to stand on.
Are you still a child molester? You haven't offered any absolute evidence that you aren't, you know.
2007-04-25 08:15:00 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The simple fact that the axis of evil - Bush, Cheney and Rove have not politically crucified her is enough proof for me. That kind of opposition to the Bush agenda is normally squashed as soon as possible. If they had the slightest inkling of illegal activity or proof of impropriety, she would have already been sacrificed on the altar for the Iraq war.
2007-04-25 08:02:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
She was briefed by the State Dept for her trip to Syria.
2007-04-25 08:26:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Show me just one bit of evidence that she is a traitor!
2007-04-25 08:06:55 · answer #6 · answered by Harry 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Hmmm-vacationing in Syria and licking the boots of known terrorists-yep sounds like treason to me.
2007-04-25 08:12:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
New system here - guilty until proven innocent?
2007-04-25 08:00:06 · answer #8 · answered by ash 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Nope, I looked everywhere and I can't find any.
2007-04-25 08:02:37 · answer #9 · answered by libstalker 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
bush is the traitor.
But you already knew that.
2007-04-25 08:02:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋