wht DO U THINK
SHOULD ICC AVOID BIAS UMPIRES IN THE FINALS
2007-04-24 16:10:28 · 14 answers · asked by ChatJ 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
What you opinion about Sri Lankan umpire Ashoka Desilva who can not judge whatever player is out or not. He don't know how to done umpiring
One or two bad decision against particular team. It can happen against the any team. After all they are human being can make mistakes. They are not bias. Simon Tauffal is the best umpire in the world
2007-04-24 18:07:58 · answer #1 · answered by Raja 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Umpires with such a caliber giving bias decisions in crucial games is very unpleasant to see.
Newsealand did pressurized the umpires in both cases but the experience umpires can take the correct decisions no matter how much pressure.
ICC should take some action against such umpires.::
2007-04-24 23:52:04 · answer #2 · answered by Dilantha2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, The Kiwis are the best.......... The Srilankans are good but they behave like animals on field. You know, it's been years that the lankans beat the Aussies! More recently, New Zealand won the chapel-hadlee series defeating the world champions, the Australians!!!!!!!!!! By luck, Sri Lanka defeated NZ and entered finals but I bet you that they won't win in finals because the King of the Kings, the Australians are there to battle with the Lankans!! Each batsman of Aus is equal to 10 times the Lankan players... Even, India entered the finals against Australia in 2003 World Cup.., did they win????? Noooooo! It's the same case of the Sri Lankans... Be prepared to see Aus's victory in finals......... and to say the truth, Fleming wasn't out during the semi-finals! the ball just touched his arms... not his bat..
2007-04-27 01:21:37 · answer #3 · answered by Zatakkk 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Umpiring was very poor yesterday. ICC should take action against these umpires. Srilankans are always on the receiving side of such decisions which the Srilankan board also should take up with ICC. I was really great with all such decisions, still Srilanka won with a good majority.
http://www.cricket.indhp.net
2007-04-25 00:20:18 · answer #4 · answered by indhp 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those umpires needed Srilanka
out of the competition really bad
I think the umpires who officiating semis
should be from other countries
Other wise they can change the teams by their whims & fancies according to achieve their own goals
i mean SA & AUS umpires wannted something else today
didn't they?
they should not umpire like this in crucial matches.
i was too astonished with the silva & Dilshan's decisions
2007-04-24 23:14:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The umpires appointed by ICC are neutral umpires. If one or two decision goes against any team, it does not mean that the umpires are biased. After all umpires are human neings and mistakes are bound to happen.
2007-04-24 23:22:15 · answer #6 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
ICC assigns the Unpires depends upon the experiance and the performance of the umpires.
2007-04-25 02:37:19 · answer #7 · answered by fairy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its easier to keep track of stuff while you are watching tv.
Aus will hopefully make it to the finals, otherwise SL has a better chance beating SA to win.
NZ was a bad team, after they faced england. They played 4 associate teams. They were never good, just had a win streak due to weaker teams. Look at how they lost against aus & vs sl today. 100 & 200 runs less than their set target.
2007-04-24 23:41:44 · answer #8 · answered by Jasper 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rudi koertzen should be shot dead and asad rauf should be shot in the head....that umpiring was beyond horrible....it was ridiculous....disgusting, disgraceful and embarassing for the ICC and an utter failure of the ICC in improving cricket!!! everyone in the ICC should be gone and its time for new people that can take the game forward!!!
2007-04-25 06:08:37 · answer #9 · answered by glen 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umpiring was poor..
Sri Lanka is da best
2007-04-25 03:12:22 · answer #10 · answered by Supun Sudaraka 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋