All things being equal, would you hire the girl named Shaniqua or the girl named Elizabeth. Why, why not?

Question

ALL things being equal. meaning they both have the SAME qualifications and experience etc. their name is the only thing thats different.

Racial Bias in Hiring

Are Emily and Brendan More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal?
Though racial inequality in the U.S. labor market is understood as a persistent problem even today, it has been difficult to measure how such discrimination works. Do employers actively discriminate against African-American job applicants? Can such discrimination be proven? What is the effect of improved credentials for African-Americans? A new study offers the answers.
http://www.chicagogsb.edu/capideas/spring03/racialbias.html

For most job applicants, getting called for an interview is the first major step towards getting a job. But what if that call never comes? Can the name listed on a resume and the perceptions of race implied by this name hinder an applicant's chances before even getting his or her foot in the door

Answer 1

I would hire which ever one has the best personality for the job. If that was the same I would hire the one that applied for the job first.

Answer 2

you want an uncomplicated answer to a complicated question. no longer conceivable. There are way too many parameters concerned about making a call. i recognize i receives burned for this yet you recognize what i'm no longer one to lie in basic terms so i'd be politically maximum excellent. Honesty is continuously the most suitable way. First why ought to i favor the employ? the front workplace? intense call employer in favor of a "fairly" reception? then who grants extra effectual, who articulates extra effectual, who seems extra effectual and who's extra alluring. Sorry yet those are data. If i'm searching for a variety in my employer i ought to employ Shaniqua ... if i favor someone to gather funds i ought to employ Shaniqua ... if i favor someone to make espresso i ought to employ Elizabeth (reason Shaniqua ought to not in any respect do it) ... data If i favor someone to guard employer i employ Shaniqua if i favor someone to guard the employer human beings i employ Elizabeth. As I stated there are way too many pre standards and criteria. question: Does Elizabeth have a British accent? ... and via ways ... Shaniqua is a alluring call.

Answer 3

Depends on the job. But it would probably come down to personality type. If the job is for something like customer service, I would probably hire the more extroverted one as she would be better with people. If it was a desk job, probably the introvert, because she would be less likely to get distracted with socializing and things of that nature.

There is always something that sets applicants apart. Even something as seemingly small as the way they present themselves could be a deciding factor. It really depends on the job.

Answer 4

Several studies on this very topic have already been done by leading social scientists. It is proven that "white-sounding" names get preferential treatment. Do a search on Dateline's website, I think you'll find more info on the research.

Before people hit thumbs down (because they didn't really read what I said and just assume I am a racist; I am not), what would I do in this situation? I would interview both candidates and base my decision on how well they presented themselves.

Answer 5

As someone who has made a career in human resources I can say most assuredly:

All things are NEVER equal in hiring. There are always pluses and minues, trade offs, etc. Two people are NEVER exactly, identically, equally qualified....their qualifications might be overall comparable--but always with differences that balance out.

It just never works the way you said--never. Because no two people are alike.

And thank God for that and for the diversity it brings.

Answer 6

It is unlikely but not impossible that two people could have the same qualifications and experience, but they will not have conducted themselves identically in the interview process. I would hire the person who best fits the requirements of the position and the company's philosophy, regardless of her name.

Answer 7

Depend, if I must choose on a paper, I will take Elizabeth, if I met both in persons, I will consider the best impression I got...
NOt my fault, when I was born, they were 99% white... Now things have changed, but still cannot change my cultural prism, it is too late for it. Of course, I may give it a try knowing that my cultural prism is outdated and ask to meet them both.. equal footing at least...

Answer 8

This is the most racial question/comment I think I've heard yet--more so even, than someone using the N-word.
Why would you even ask this? It makes you sound like an egocentric jerk.
What the heck would a name have to do with anything, anyway? I'm almost led to think the only reason you posted this up was to stir up controversy. In any case, you're a pretty sad person.

Answer 9

Elizabeth. Honestly, there are negatives attached to names like Shaniqua.

Answer 10

Their name would not even come into play with a decision for me. If I had to discount qualifications and experience, I would then go to personal appearance and overall attitude.