...for you present pro-war supporters.
2007-04-24 14:21:36 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well by then, all the soldiers willing to fight for this country will have been killed, the draft will have to be employed, meaning all these pro-war supporters will have to go over there and they will die too. So if there are any left and W's kin gets in office, they would still support it. There's not a whole lot you can do about dumb.
2007-04-24 14:29:23 · answer #1 · answered by pinkluxe 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
against the Iraq conflict yet because we began it we could desire to end it. of course there is the possibility that with Saddam in potential we would have ultimately had to pass to conflict in some unspecified time sooner or later. Who is acquainted with? I basically think of the money could have been greater suitable spent in the USA of a on kin potential progression. recommendations you, i'm not some fool who's blindly anti-conflict or anti-militia. till truthfully everyone in the international ceases to be aggressive there'll continually be a desire for a militia. as long as international locations compete for land and supplies there'll be conflict. people who marketing campaign to end all wars or get rid of the militia stay in a dreamworld.
2016-10-13 10:11:02 · answer #2 · answered by adkisson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not a pro war supporter and hope that we are not still sending our children to Iraq. However I will still support the troops that are there.
We or our governments have helped to create this action and have helped to tear the country down further so we do have obligations to help the people govern them selves.Our troops are doing their job so I still shall be supporting them while trying to have them with drawn and other options to support Iraq put in place.
god Bless all those that serve.
2007-04-24 14:41:07 · answer #3 · answered by Goosemoon 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If the libs get their way and we retreat/loose in Iraq then you will not have to worry about fighting there.We will be figthing here (USA) for our survival just like in Israel.You people do not have a clue -this is ww3.They are serious about turning everybody into islamonuts!
2007-04-24 14:33:42 · answer #4 · answered by dumbuster 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I actually predicted 2012.
But yes, as long as we remain safe, I am good with the War on Terror FOR AS LONG AS IT TAKES.
Just like the Cold War kept us from nuclear war. Although, unlike the Cold War, I think the War on Terror won't go 50 years.
Just so you know, if everyone in America had my resolve, the War on Terror would be wrapping up in 6 months.
2007-04-24 14:27:32 · answer #5 · answered by Mark M 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No. If we are there doing what we are doing in 3 years I will have a problem.
I suspect that the Iraqi people will be able to defend themselves within a year.
2007-04-24 14:32:03 · answer #6 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I believe in what this war stands for....I wont be changing my mind because it may be inconvenient for me.....I'm not wishy washy thank you.....I fully understood what war meant when I chose to support it....it's not supposed to be pretty...it's war!
2007-04-24 14:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, By that time I'm sure all the republicans will be standing in line to serve in Iraq.
2007-04-24 14:26:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yes. Only a few of our goals are on the table. The rest are yet to be shared. We aren't stupid. We don't advertize our plans just because a few socialists and seditious people insist we share our national secrets with the world or be called "liars".
Always funny to those of us with family in government to see people who really have no idea what's going on.
2007-04-24 14:25:28 · answer #9 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Do you have any idea how many years of fighting it took to create our present Country? I doubt it! You should read an AMERICAN HISTORY BOOK, instead of your Koran!
I, for one, am glad that our Fore Fathers Persevered!
2007-04-24 14:28:03 · answer #10 · answered by Sentinel 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋