I thinks its going to be Obama or Gore vs. John McCain or Rudy. I don't know what Hillary stands for.
2007-04-24 13:40:12 · 18 answers · asked by Bauer Power 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No
2007-04-24 13:42:54 · answer #1 · answered by Don W 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Socialism begets apathy. In socialist international locations, the government the two heavily controls all enterprise or owns it outright. the main important to innovation and entrepreneurship is understanding you will very own the enterprise you creat and save the money you earn from risking some time and money to advance and construct it. Socialism takes that away, or a great deal reduces it, struggling with the entrepreneur from commencing the enterprise. Why threat lots for thus little. whether a enterprise is began, it and the owner is taxed at this kind of severe fee that the losses outweigh the ease. some socialist international locations have an smart tax fee of seventy 5% or bigger, besides as nationwide sales taxes (VAT) upwards of 25%. think of of it this style; could you artwork an 8 hour day in case you have been basically allowed to maintain 2 hours worth of pay? we've a mixed financial equipment, a capitalistic one the place inner maximum possession is the main important, yet social classes exist. it is slowly changing with the government takeover of sectors of our financial equipment, mutually with student loans and well being care. in case you study the writing on the wall, preparation and potential are next, with greater freebies being promised via the left. yet there's a seize. My 8th grade civics instructor, Mr. Holmes, mentioned it best; TINSTAAFL. "there is not any such element as a loose lunch." somebody has to pay for each thing. In socialism, or "communism-gentle", you pay for it with extremely severe taxes and the shortcoming of maximum of your freedom.
2016-10-13 10:07:30 · answer #2 · answered by adkisson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the only reason why she might not win is just because she is a woman. I don't have anything against women, I just think that the U.S. should remain to be run by men. It makes me feel better that a man is running the country and not a woman.
I want Al Gore to run for president again. I bet if he ran, he would win by landslide vote.
2007-04-24 14:01:28 · answer #3 · answered by AdrianClay 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Al Gore should run and if he does Can win the presidency agian and with bushs out of the picture get to serve the term this time.
2007-04-24 16:48:46 · answer #4 · answered by goodins2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree; shes got no actual consistency whatsoever. I like your match ups!!! Guiliani might have done better as a democrat with all the abortion stuff. McCain gets props for Nuclear energy but his song and dance as well as shopping habits leave much to be desired.
2007-04-24 13:49:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The problem I have with her is that she has no ideas to be running. She's popular but we just passed 2 terms of a popular person with no ideas. There are other candidate that have a reason for running, they have ideas they have a vision and would like to implement for the benefit of all Americans.
2007-04-24 14:16:23 · answer #6 · answered by Jose R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary stands to do what is best for the AMERICAN public
2007-04-27 08:46:38 · answer #7 · answered by rp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think she is going to win. I don't think she will be in the Primarys. It will be McCain and Guiliani.
2007-04-24 13:49:55 · answer #8 · answered by dielibralsdie 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think she will win simply because she is a woman. I don't think enough men will vote for her. And she can't win with just the women's votes. (Thank God)
2007-04-24 13:50:07 · answer #9 · answered by ♥itsme♥ 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If she really thought she could win , she would give up,
her Senate seat.
2007-04-24 13:45:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hilary is definitly not going to win. If I was a democrat i would definitly not vote for her at all
2007-04-24 13:43:56 · answer #11 · answered by bee bee boo 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋