U.S. casualties are increasing again and recent weeks have brought the deadliest attack in Baghdad since the war began and the deadliest attack yet inside the Green Zone, a suicide bombing in the Iraqi Parliament, according to reports.
2007-04-24 13:39:00 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I keep explaining that Bush needs a place to go to when he is no longer president, he won't have the excessive protection he has now, and people are going to go after him. Iraq is the perfect location for him to go to, but he needs to get rid of the people who oppose him, so that only his family, friends and people who have been paid to stand by him throughout these years are the only people who need to be there with him. Granted he will need some Iraqi's to work for him, but they won't amount to anything he will have to worry about. By weakening the economy here in the United States, he will be putting us in such a poor state of affairs, that we will not be able to go after him in Iraq. So, the escalation of violence, people dying, troops dying, this all helps him to achieve his goal, he needs to have this completed by the time his term is up, the surge is going to help it happen faster. There is no other reason for the interest in Iraq, ask yourself, what would constitute a win in Iraq? What are we trying to achieve? What exactly would have to happen in order to say we won the war in Iraq? Won What???
2007-04-24 14:14:18 · answer #1 · answered by Coulterbasher01 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
save on there hypocriter. First, comparing Vietnam (a conflict of over 30 years in the previous) to Iraq (basically ended some weeks in the previous) is ridiculous. historic previous will let us know greater of Iraq than all persons understand now. And c'mon, those WMDs on no account have been given right here up. call all the Presidents who went to conflict basically to have the very reason they went to conflict fall with the aid of. and then to have a crappy flow out physique of innovations as nicely??? What President had all of those factors?? a minimum of with LBJ each and each guy or female new we've been there to furnish up the unfold of communism. Secondly, the basically factor combating Iraq from exploding back is Iran (who's additionally a guess). And finally, relax guy. you're leaping up and down giving Bush credit over a quagmire that has finally winded down. this is like giving somewhat one credit for an examination they have been given a D- on, basically as a results of fact it wasn't an entire failure. back in 2002, in case you knew that this conflict might drag into the subsequent Presidency in 2010, might you be prepared to help or furnish Bush credit for that??
2016-12-10 10:36:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he and his administration is so doggone stubborn. He's done the "stay the course" for a while with a negative result, and he can't back down now to admit his mistake. He's in too deep.
And the troops, their families and the Iraqis have to suffer because of this.
2007-04-24 13:51:25 · answer #3 · answered by SupaDupaWoman 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Now you are starting to understand.
We cannot leave if the violence continues, therefore create more violence.
President Bush wants to stay there permanently, so the increase in violence and death are progress for him.
2007-04-24 13:45:37 · answer #4 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
9 soldiers from the us 82ND Airborne Division from Fort Bragg, N.C., the nations "All-Americans", and many more wounded.
Bush only wants to win by his terms, he wants his own version of "Victory", not the version of those who lead our military, or those who fight and die for the lies he continues to perpetuate. He is a sinful man, who will not be stopped until he is brought down by force, just like Saddam. Perhaps he should start digging his hole.
2007-04-24 13:48:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
it's ok, it's ok.
the bush team is currently working on changing the definition of the word 'failure' so that even though it may look like a dismal and morbid failure right now, soon it will actually be a success.
that is about the mentality that i hear from war supporters.
2007-04-24 13:50:41 · answer #6 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Because 'progress' to W is another day past w/out falling on his as*; anyway what's he going to do, admit it's a war of terror aimed at getting control over OPEC permanently?
2007-04-24 13:45:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
Bush is progressively getting his cronies and himself richer. That is the only progress that has been made in Iraq in a long, long time.
2007-04-24 13:49:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
In Dayala they have made it clear they don't want Westerners there. We are there anyway because our fearless leader doesn't give a damn what they or anyone else cares.
2007-04-24 13:47:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
He's been saying we are making progress for four years. He does not know what the word progress means anymore.
2007-04-24 13:41:57 · answer #10 · answered by rollo_tomassi423 6 · 8⤊ 2⤋