English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal sent the memo after hearing the president might mention Tillman in a speech, "which might cause public embarrassment if the circumstances of Cpl. Tillman's death become public."
Noting a Pentagon e-mail from April 28 about White House speech writer John Currin seeking information about Tillman for the president's speech at the White House Correspondents' Dinner a few days later, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., suggested that it was more than just a coincidence that when "the president spoke at the Correspondents' Dinner, he was careful in his wording.

"[Bush] praised Pat Tillman's courage but carefully avoided describing how he was killed," said Cummings. "It seems possible that the P4 memo was a direct response to the White House's inquiry. And if that is true, it means that the White House knew the true facts about Cpl. Tillman's death before the memorial service and weeks before the Tillman family was told

Typical chimp lie for war propoganda.

2007-04-24 13:16:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

This is an old lie he has told many more since that one.

2007-04-24 13:42:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Typical seditious behavior.

No, not another lie. You seem to have trouble with two concepts:

1) "innocent until proven guilty"
You still haven't proved that he's lied a first time. You just keep repeating the same unproven rumor as if that proves it.

2) the definition of "lie"
Because he didn't say anything he "lied". Right. Sure. Anything for political points, right?

You decry propaganda, then repeat the same propaganda that has been spouted against our President for as long as there have been Presidents, Democrat or Republican.

People like you did the same thing to Former President Clinton.

We're tired of it. You've chosen sides in WW III. So have we. Expect to be answered.

2007-04-24 13:23:58 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 2 0

I thought Bush is so stupid he can't read? Now you tell me he knows how to use the internet that Algore invented? I'm so confused. Maybe we could elect Mrs. Clinton in '08, she was the smartest woman in the world, but didn't know a THING about Bills affairs, even when women came out of the Oral Office with torn dresses. Seems to me the CIA fell down on the job of finding Dildos of Mass Destruction hidden in the Oral Office. Let's blame that one on Bush too.

Now..what was your question?

2007-04-24 13:24:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

whether you or I agreed with Bush is beside the point...we are actually not the international the two. The United international locations agreed Saddam became available. The disagreement is on what became the suitable process action in coping with the possibility. particularly, the UN = the international, for what its worth.

2016-10-13 10:04:23 · answer #4 · answered by eidemiller 4 · 0 0

I really hope Congress gets a pure heart and Impeaches All Of them...Congress could handle the War better than GWB anyday...Bottom Line is no Iraqis will ever listen to ANYTHING gwb has to say.......They might Respect Congress a little more.

2007-04-24 13:22:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Try e-mailing the Whitehouse and ask G. W. Bush if he lied.

2007-04-24 13:21:43 · answer #6 · answered by Patience 6 · 0 0

Better question: has Dubya ever said anything (publicly) that WASN'T a lie?

2007-04-24 13:22:06 · answer #7 · answered by Craig L 3 · 0 0

I don't think Bush lies. He is just like most Democratic party leaders in that he is not bright at all!

2007-04-24 13:27:52 · answer #8 · answered by Prophotoman 4 · 0 1

If my mentor Bush,has committed a lie,I would be not supporting him anymore,,,free press does not support lies or infidelity

2007-04-24 13:26:40 · answer #9 · answered by freepress 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers