Did you witness the last National election, or read anything about the case against Tom DeLay? Can you say Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004? How about Diebold?
You need to lay off the Republican Kool-Aid.
2007-04-24 13:18:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by drespi 1
·
1⤊
4⤋
Ever since JFK stole the election from Richard M. Nixon, with the help of.Chicago Mayor, Richard J. Daley and *dead* voters, Dems have been either stealing or trying to steal the presidency of the United States.
LBJ may not have stolen the election in 1968; but Jimmy Carter did so in 1976, using the excuse of Ford's pardon of Nixon!
George H. W. Bush threw away his chances when he caved in to a Democrat-controlled Congress' demands and raised taxes, even though he said he wouldn't; but Clinton wouldn't have won, even then, without the help of Ross Perot! Then the Republicans gave Clinton his second term by running Bob Dole (AKA: Clinton-light)!
In 2000, the liberal media, Chicago Mayor, Richard M. Daley (son of Richard J.) and "dead" voters, again, tried their darnedest to steal the election from "W", even though the Bill Clinton-stacked U. S. Supreme Court voted against the Dems, 5-4, then they voted against the Dems, 7-3 (in the *more* significant decision).
At least, in 2004, Kerry gave up without much of a fight; but *still* the Dems keep crying "voter fraud" - about both the 2000 and the 2004 Presidential Elections.
Why do they keep crying voter fraud? Because they don't have *any* better or, even good, ideas, and can't win, even with almost all of the news media, i.e., the "Drive-by" media, on their side!
2007-04-24 15:08:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by trebor namyl hcaeb 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
To accuse the Republicans as fraudulent voters is a misnomer in the highest sense of the word. It's the Democrat Party that has been caught registering illegal aliens in southern California, prison inmates and dead people back east!
2007-04-24 13:22:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Prophotoman 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Ummm...let's see here, Kerry "accepted" his loss without fighting Ohio even though even the GAO stated there were vast voting irregularities in 2004. Gore contested because he won the popular vote but lost one state by 537 votes... What does it say, it says maybe Republcans like the head of Diebold shouldn't make public statements about locking up the election for repubs without first making sure they won't get caught. If anything, i think the Democrats have been far too accepting of these tactics, where Republicans have traditionally set up their states like Ohio in 2004, to put as few voting stations in democratic districts and too overload republican ones since most people can't take 5 hours off of work to vote. But I also think people like you who hate America don't want to see transparent elections because you'd have no shot of winning a dog catcher election in a lot of areas nowdays...how did 2006 treat you, bushbot moron, hide under your bed from Al Queada yet today little girl?
2007-04-24 13:21:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by gunkinthedrain 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
I suppose in recent years why is it when a republican wins office their happens to be a voting error (Florida, Ohio) that is the sole reason in which they win? They are about to lose if that state is not won and suddenly instead of actual results we wait two weeks and of course they end up winning when half the voters claim they weren't allowed to vote.. nevermind this watch or read something in relation rather than just blabbering hate for once.
2007-04-24 13:37:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by bs b 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
I think it says a lot. I am so very tired of these goddamn self-righteous liberal bastards, trying to save all of the poor people, who are in poverty because they refuse to help themselves, when they cannot solve their own ignorance. Sorry I needed to rant, and I suppose I will be reported, but quite frankly I don't give a damn.
2007-04-24 13:18:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by asmith1022_2006 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
They are loud mouth sore losers. It says they know their following are very gullible and will raise hell until the next election. Does it make them right - NO.
2007-04-24 13:17:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by thewindywest 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
Anything bad in their eyes they blame on some other person so it is no different for a lost election.
2007-04-24 13:19:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
They were taught as children if you stamp your feet and scream you will get your way. Republicans learned the hard way that 'no' was final.
2007-04-24 13:17:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Uhh...you living in a time warp, Dr. Brown?
In case you didn't get the memo, the Democrats WON the recent mid-terms.
Hello?
2007-04-24 13:20:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋