It's for a journal at school. I have no idea.
Also!!
How would the world be different if fdr's failure to obey the neutrality act would not have occured?
What kind of world would the Jews have been in, in europe?
How many would have survived the Holocaust?
2007-04-24 13:08:59 · 6 answers · asked by darkfurl 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Well, specifically, i'm talking about the one that was initiated during the holocaust. that's why i was talking about the holocaust in my question. and no, this is not a rhetorical question. you would know that if you read the info underneath the question. seriously, what is up in that head? definitely not brains, that's for sure!
2007-04-24 14:53:02 · update #1
I don't think the question is valid. Had FDR violated the act, his actions would be declared unconstitutional, and brought before the supreme court or even impeachment. Congress amended the act to allow merchant ships to arm themselves, which inevitably led to US involvement into world.
Then again, if the question is just rhetorical, let your imagination run wild. Only sky is the limit. Though, personally, I have a problem of guessing how many more Jews would have died. Holocaust is not just a number of deaths. Real people have perished horribly. Rhetorical questions like this seem very callous.
XR
2007-04-24 13:39:05 · answer #1 · answered by XReader 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Germany would have won the war.
Communists would have been thrown out of Russia.
There would not have been a Holocaust. The Jews of Europe would have been deported to Madagascar per Hitler's plan.
2007-04-24 13:42:19 · answer #2 · answered by answer man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Japan would have conquered Asia. Germany would have conquered central and western Europe. Italy would have conquered southern Europe and north Africa. Then, Germany and Italy would have invaded the Soviet Union from the west and Japan would have invaded the Soviet Union from the east. Things would have gotten interesting then.
2007-04-24 13:19:40 · answer #3 · answered by peachstatehoosier 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
May I suggest respectfully to you that you become a bit inquisitive. You may wish to subscribe to the worldwide Yahoo! group which deals with suchh questions. Remember_The_Holocaust@yahoogroups.com
2007-04-26 14:18:45 · answer #4 · answered by Lejeune42 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.. Blessings...Jesus was saying, unless you eat My flesh and drink my blood....you have no understanding in you......John 6: 52-58: He who eats my flesh and drinks my’ blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live for ever. (John 6: 56-58............to eat his flesh and drink his blood, is to believe in Jesus, to abide in him. It is to have an inter-personal relationship with Jesus. Just as the life of the vine gives life to the branches, those who abide in Jesus participate in the life of Christ...... .During the last supper, Jesus took the cup and said, ‘Drink from it all of you. This is the blood of the covenant which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins’.......Jesus said: ‘The bread which I give is my own flesh; I gave it for the life of the world’....So eating his flesh and drinking his blood is not simply for the sake of our personal salvation alone. It is not a private affair, but a public matter. Jesus does not give his flesh and blood only for our personal salvation; it is also the bread and drink for a journey into the life of the world, bearing witness to eternal life in Christ...... Every time you eat this bread and drink this cup You proclaim the Lord’s death till he comes...
2016-05-17 23:52:56 · answer #5 · answered by francie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which neutrality act do you mean? According to wikipedia there were four:
2007-04-24 13:22:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋