Has anyone heard a better explanation of how far out of touch Harry Reid is with Iraq and national security?

Question

Yahoo editorial: pre liberal whine, exact quote.
Consider this: How can the move towards victory in an ongoing war be measured by the mere existence of violence or by its intensity? While a war is taking place, it is - of course and of necessity - comprised of violent acts. Yet because the question raised by Senator Reid had been about whether we had been victorious in the war, he made an unnecessary and confused statement. Yes, the war is not yet over, America has neither won nor lost decisively, and it is precisely for that reason that one must expect to see the violence one sees in wartime. But in Mr. Reid's statement, he misguidedly concluded that the US-led coalition had utterly lost the war in Iraq, just because the enemy still attacks and counter-attacks.

But then, if one reflects on what the highest figure in the Senate has said, one would conclude that he and other like-minded politicians defy the implacable reality of logic.

how refreshing they FINALLY GOT IT RIGHT!!!!

Answer 1

logic went out with the baby and the bath water long ago

Answer 2

the following we bypass with Fred ,tell them what they favor to take heed to, Thompson bending the actuality. First lets seem on the data. The warfare in Iraq is a multitude. we are spending further and extra and extra money on it. the persons responsible of the warfare let us know quite some issues about the warfare than our own newshounds embedded with the troops. This leads me to trust that Reid is acquainted with somewhat about why those data exist. in basic terms because you're or have a commanding voice and talk for Paul Harvey does no longer make you an expert. i ought to assert Fred is in straightforward words using speaking factors back and Reid is a minimum of attempting to get the Iraq challenge a minimum of a a workable element. it appears that evidently that incompetence is rampant contained in the warfare in Iraq.