2007-04-24 10:40:16 · 18 answers · asked by Crude 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
you geeks said the same thing about brock lesnar and look how big of a loser he turned out to be
it's all vince's fault letting young idiots become champions and boosting their ego just so they get cockier and start destroying property for no reason
how smart does that make you morons feel?
2007-04-24 10:41:45 · update #1
I never admit to Yahoo! Answers or anywhere that Randy Orton is the future of the business. I know for a fact that any one person that can cause $30,000 solely in hotel damages is not the future of anything. Orton has a lot of potential and COULD be the future of the WWE, but it's like he doesn't want to. He keeps getting himself into trouble and he needs to certainly GROW UP. He needs to learn to take responsibility for his actions and then maybe he could be the future of the WWE. Right now I think Mr. Kennedy/Money in the Bank is the future of the WWE and the future World Heavyweight champion.
2007-04-24 10:52:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually, Lesnar never had any disciplinary actions during his career; he left after only two years in the business to pursue another agenda. While he was in the WWE, I want you to point to a single stretch of time where he could be considered a loser. He literally *OWNED* SmackDown his entire career! Granted, I didn't like the way he was shoved down the people's throats; I mean come on, Undisputed WWE Champion after only 5 months? That's ridiculous. Orton at least stayed in the mid-card for a couple years during his tenure with Evolution, but even he shot to the top pretty quickly. Same with Cena and Batista (who has never even held a mid-card title!).
I remember a time when the average 'wait time' to become a World Champion was between six to eight years in the WWE, not counting time spent in the developmental circuit (OVW, DSW). If you look at the last five WWE Champions (Cena, Edge, RVD, JBL and Eddie Guerrero), Cena's championship came earliest at a little under 3 years; next is Edge, after *8* years.
I guess what I'm trying to say (and this may really have nothing to do with your semantic rant) is that WWE needs to go back to its old formula of forging champions: time.
2007-04-24 10:50:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You Would Take JBLS Job In .5 Seconds
2007-04-24 14:32:12 · answer #3 · answered by cathy c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm not a orton fan..yet he has skills...and can be very able i the wwe... This "Legacy" gruop is dumb he needs to drop it...he needs to get right into a gruop like evoltioun...or a gruop with skills...
2016-10-30 05:08:46 · answer #4 · answered by cabaniss 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no future to the WWE.
TNA will become the #1 promotion in the next few years and WWE will be no more.
2007-04-24 10:50:40 · answer #5 · answered by «G6260» 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, I'm so not one of those morons i never thought he would be the next big thing. I think CM PUNK will be.
2007-04-24 10:46:35 · answer #6 · answered by Rated R Diva ♥ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
tthis is one of the resons this section is geting screwed up people spend more time insulting than asking real questions.
2007-04-24 10:54:32 · answer #7 · answered by undertaker dead man walking 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey u look i hate randy hes gayl but i wanted to see rey be the champ
2007-04-24 10:43:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
LMFAO Crude you know you one of my peeps,but I'm still a huge fan of his MOSTLY because he's near my hometown,BUT I do know he's a total @$$hole!
2007-04-24 10:50:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
if he can get it together he can be the future of the wwe
---If Ya Smeeelll!---
2007-04-24 10:48:38 · answer #10 · answered by PrimeTime 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋