Youve gotta love these royals havnt you eh eh.
2007-04-24 10:11:10 · 26 answers · asked by squirrel 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
princess di no contest against an old hag
2007-04-24 10:15:28 · answer #1 · answered by a m 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
First of all Camilla is actually the Duchess of Cornwall, not the Princess of Wales, There we were thinking only Charles was the one who needed glasses,..... although the image changer s, designers, primpers and stylists, dentists must have been working flat out to improve Camilla´s looks, to make her half as attractive as Diana was. Diana, had tremendous poise, elegance and grace, and the elusive enigmatic charisma, that Charles found put him and the rest of the Royals looking like old fuddy-duddies and stole their lime-light. Instead of being threatened by her star quality,they should have nurtured that and guided ,and treasured her,she would have been Charles crowning Glory, people the world over Loved and were fascinated , and intrigued by her charisma, she was Britains Best Advertisement at one time. Charles was the cad in the whole of that sorry saga, If he wasn't in the high position that he is, it wouldn't matter, but he chose before , during ,and after marriage, another like minded person who doesn´t hold with the Biblical idea of the sanctity of marriage , how on earth they are going to whitewash that before he becomes king and the DEFENDER OF THE FAITH , of the Church of England. Oh, he got in just in time for us to see him as a shining example of the "faithful" church-going husband. Camilla no doubt has made him happy, because she is more his cup of tea, than Diana , who was head and shoulders too good for him.
2007-04-25 20:29:46 · answer #2 · answered by HarleyQueen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I have to correct the spelling here. Princess Diana, also styled as Her Royal Highness Princess of Wales Princess Diana, was the classic beauty. Camilla, is the officially styled as the Duchess of Cornwall. She is technically the Princess of Wales because she married Prince Charles, but no one would stand for her being called that title. Charles was already the Duke of Cornwall, so making her Duchess of Cornwall was simple and logical. Yes, they are fascinating lots, aren't they?
2007-04-24 19:12:53 · answer #3 · answered by .. .this can't be good 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Diana ALL THE WAY! She was classically beautiful and she had a bit of spice as well. Camilla is well past it and looks like she's got something stuck where the sun doesn't shine. Diana, rest her soul, is a legend and will never be forgotten. She and her sons are the only royalty I have respect for.
2007-04-25 15:03:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Princess Diana was by far the most beautful woman in the modern world and camilla is not by right calles the Princess of Wales she is the duchess of cornwell and is not called a princess but HRH (her royal highness). Camilla would never make the cover of any mag other then fox and hound or woman that look like there horse
2007-04-24 21:53:27 · answer #5 · answered by The High King 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Princess Di was the first Princess Would that make Camilla a second hand Princess???
2007-04-26 16:46:49 · answer #6 · answered by Granny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Princess Diana was a class act, Camilla will never be able to follow. She was truly loved by all the people be they black, white or in between, and she loved them. If she was pregnant she will have her child with her.
She deserved happiness, Camilla was a false friend to her she was having an affair with her husband behind her back, What woman would forgive that betrayal no one. Diana is in heaven and happy Charles cannot hurt her any more.
2007-04-24 19:53:45 · answer #7 · answered by Angel Bonnie 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That you again squirrel...
Diana of course, although beauty is always in the eye of the beholder...
starof94
Although Camilla is styled as The Duchess of Cornwall, because she is the wife and Consort of The Prince of Wales, she is legally The Princess of Wales....whether we like it or not!
2007-04-24 19:12:01 · answer #8 · answered by sarch_uk 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Considering that Princess Di was caked in make-up and died at the age of 36, and considering that Camilla is well into her 50s and looks perfectly OK for her age, there is no comparison unless you think about what Di would have looked like after another 20 years of sleeping around.
2007-04-25 20:18:26 · answer #9 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Princess DI hands down. It's not Camilla Princess of wales it's "Camilla Duchess of Cornwall"
2007-04-24 19:04:29 · answer #10 · answered by starof94 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Pricess Di was a classic beauty. She was the English Rose. Camilla is not beautiful but Charles obviously finds her alluring and she is all he wants.
2007-04-25 04:13:12 · answer #11 · answered by nemesis 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋