English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's all about applying yourself isn't it?

2007-04-24 08:51:30 · 7 answers · asked by Jerse 3 in Education & Reference Higher Education (University +)

7 answers

The reputation. Similar to Yale and Stanford. The saying is, if you have a diploma of any of the big ones, no one will accept that you really are an idiot until you are well into your 40s. ;-)

2007-04-24 08:59:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It is all about reputation. So that leads one to believe that the Harvard's are better than state schools for three reasons.

1. Larger endowment, which means more resources.
2. The top faculty in the world teaching their students.
3. The best students competing with each other.

The state schools are able to compete quite well though, because their endowments are nothing to sneeze at and they get a lot of help from the government for research dollars. The faculty at the state programs are quite good as well, and I am sure many of them can hold their own. As for the best students, I don't buy that argument necessarily. A great preponderance of students in the Ivy League come from great wealth and power giving them an automatic leg-up on the rest of us. Harvard, Yale and the like are probably better schools overall, because the powerful ensure that it will remain so. But you are absolutely right, if you apply yourself you can compete with graduates of these programs. Problem is, you may have to start lower on the totem pole with less connections.

2007-04-24 10:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by David G 3 · 1 0

I certainly think so, but there are a lot of people out there who think it is very prestigious thing to have gone to Harvard.

It really all depends on what you intend to do with your life. If you wish to be considered for certain kinds of jobs with certain kinds of firms or companies, a degree from a big name school is essential. And to be fair, the academic standards are very high at the big name schools. Higher than at a state school.

But if your learning style doesn't fit a typical academic scene, you will not do well at such a school.

If your career aspirations are set a bit lower, then doing well wherever you end up will be sufficient to help you land a good job.

In the end, we all (well, most of us, anyway) have to get up in the morning and go to work. Make sure that what you end up studying is something you love to do and are good at. The salary really doesn't matter and neither does where you went to school.

And don't forget to have a life, too. A husband or wife and a family are great things to come home to at the end of the day.

2007-04-24 09:11:22 · answer #3 · answered by slykitty62 7 · 0 0

Abraham Lincoln is acknowledged by utilising skill of optimal government as u . s . a .’s suitable proper president, despite the fact that many others in that workplace had extra suitable education and journey. For all of obama's training he has never incredibly practiced regulation for a substantial length of time, and his claims of being a professor of regulation have been debunked, as he grew to grow to be into somewhat merely a senior lecturer on go away from Harvard. so what he somewhat took faraway from that education is basically untested. Bush has a point from Harvard too . . . it did not look to assist him plenty. u . s . a . has merely ever had one PHD as a persident, Woodrow Wilson. Wilson grew to grow to be ultimate right into a great president, yet even with Wilson's proper efforts to reconcile the U. S. and Germany after WWI, the Treaty of Versailles, left the two the Germans and distinctive human beings bitterly disenchanted and he left workplace broken and defeated. Obama can not carry a candle to Wilson. No volume of instructing can prepare you to be a pacesetter, leaders are born not made.

2016-11-27 01:46:29 · answer #4 · answered by crupi 4 · 0 0

Academic studies have found that those who get accepted to Harvard and go to state universities tend to do as well as those who go to Harvard.

However, that doesn't mean that the average person who goes to a state university does as well (in fact, they do not).

There are three main advantages to going to a place like Harvard. The first is that you get first rate faculty. This is often true at the better state universities (e.g., Berkeley, Michigan, Virginia) but not true at lesser public universities.

The second is that your classmates are among the best and the brightest -- so you can learn from them.

The third is that corporations know that most of the students at a place like Harvard will be bright -- while they have to sift through the public universities to see which are good. This gives students at top schools access to better jobs.

You can get a great education at most universities -- you almost certainly will get one at the top schools.

2007-04-24 09:06:21 · answer #5 · answered by Ranto 7 · 6 3

Prestige. It looks lovely on a resume or a curriculum vitae.

2007-04-25 09:18:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Looks better on a resume, then you get hired quicker and make more money.

2007-04-24 09:00:20 · answer #7 · answered by Brian554 1 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers