grrrrrrrrrr...I am 30something why do you keep trying to get me to say my "real" age?? lol....more toward the higher end.
The oldest I would date would be 28ish...because I have a daughter who is 17 and how strange would that be if I was dating an 18 yr old....
2007-04-24 08:05:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Niffer 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I wouldn't date anyone that was 10 years or more younger than I. And at 18-19, a 40-years old is old enough to be that persons parent. How can dating someone your kid's age be a good thing? Besides, l've known guys that have done this & they look pathetic, or look like they are out with their daughter. No thanks.
Also, there is too much difference in attitude, things you would have in common and a whole lot more.
2007-04-24 15:08:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Enchanted 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm 31, the youngest I would date is 25. I wouldn't date an 18-19 y.o. because that person still hasn't gone through the "stupid phase" (party time). I need someone more focused in life and ready to establish a committed relationship. I don't think you can take that kind of decision at 18.
2007-04-24 15:06:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Miss T 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
can i answer, even though i'm older (50)? I MIGHT. and that's a big might. God knows I like the skin tightness and looks of youth. And I like the spirit of youth. And god knows I would LOVE to date a young dude like that. BUT, there's more to life than great, inspired sex (although that counts for a lot). What would an 18 year old and I possibly have in common (besides a love of dick)? We grew up in totally different times. What would there be to talk about/do together? A few things, but I think common experience counts for a lot. Hell, I can remember when you could have unprotected sex, and if you got clap or syph, a shot of antibiotics was all it took to get rid of it. Not so today.
2007-04-24 17:50:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am 35, and I would not date an 18-19 year old. I'm sorry, but I would feel like I was dating a kid. Technically, could be my son. (I have Friends my age with kids that age). I would never be able to take him seriously as a partner.
2007-04-24 15:27:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lady M 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
depends on the maturity of the girl. last year i dated a 19 year old for a couple months ( she persued me ) she was great but i found out quickly that i should have continued to say no. I probably would have to say ( after learning my lesson) 25 would be the absolute youngest. Im 38
2007-04-24 15:15:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by bigdee_x 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer 30-40, -I'd never date a woman under 18 but they should be 21+ for the bars & clubs, the past 10+ yrs., my dates have been 40-45. (I'm 36.)
2007-04-24 15:18:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by strange-artist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't because my daughter is 18, just seems icky. Plus guys that young are usually not mature enough for me. (I said USUALLY so don't have a fit)
I think the youngest I would date (if I was single) is 30.
I'm 37
2007-04-24 15:08:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bek 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
25 would be pretty young for me in that I am 34. It's all about the life experience and phases of life / maturity thing. There of course are exceptions to this - some 34 year olds act 18 and vice versa.
2007-04-24 15:07:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by ape54321 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm 41 and I could never date an 18-19 y/o Precious. I've always liked older men. You know how that is . . . . . . . .
2007-04-24 16:31:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dated a 36-yr-old when I was 19. I don't see a problem with age unless it's pedophilia.
2007-04-24 15:06:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
1⤋