Oh yeah...they found one engine that was from another aircraft, what's up with that?
2007-04-24 07:06:33 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is no way anything but a missile could make a 16ft hole, prior to the collapse of the roof. The official story just doesn't hold water! *sm*
2007-04-24 23:00:31 · answer #1 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The facts to adequately answer your question and debunk the "no wreckage/wrong wreckage" claims have been available for several years.
Now that I cannot be reported for violating the "not an answer" policy, let me express my dissapointment that you are now just cut & pasting your old questions from your already suspended spamming accounts.
The new avatar is cuter, but no less lazy than the last.
2007-04-24 14:48:47 · answer #2 · answered by u_bin_called 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Crash a plane into a steel reinforced concrete building at 500 miles an hour and see what is left.
The pentagon is military headquarters, thus it was made to withstand car bombs, ect. How little damage the plane did was testament to how well built the pentagon was.
2007-04-24 14:11:06 · answer #3 · answered by ringshank1980 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
How any logical person could see the Pentagon damage and still believe the governments official explaination is incredible!
The only explainantion I can come up with is people can't bring themselves to realize the whole ugly truth!
There is no way a plane the size of the plane the government said hit the Pentagon could "vaporize"!
Dirty B@stards!!
2007-04-24 14:13:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Conservative Terrorists crashed it into the Pentagon at 600 mph, it made 3 holes easy.
Where do you find information on another engine? How reliable is the source?
2007-04-24 14:12:01 · answer #5 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Conspiracy theory alert..... It was really Moveon.org under the financial backing of George Soros, and now noted metallurgist Rosie O Donnell, placed explosives at the site to help the democratic part sweep to power n later elections...Since physics does not need to play into it they mistakenly only left one engine......as soon as I get my web site and a couple of disgruntle goverment employees...I will have a following!!!!
"Never let truth get in the way of a good story" Conspiracy creed.
2007-04-24 14:18:55 · answer #6 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Because there never was a "flight 77" that hit the Pentagon.
It was a missile.
2007-04-24 14:11:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Your proof is laughable. Your questions are redundant. Your multiple profiles are bothersome. Your continued violation of the TOS is wrong. Your reporting other users for disagreeing is against the TOS. But you don't care, do you? It furthers your personal vendetta against anyone that dares disagree with you!
2007-04-24 14:12:39 · answer #8 · answered by enuffsaid75 1 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Kooky leftwing rants, Thats how.
2007-04-24 14:25:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Value Jet crash...look it up
2007-04-24 14:10:49 · answer #10 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋