2007-04-24 05:49:03 · 7 answers · asked by selena c 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Gor killing? Are you referring to yourself?
2007-04-24 05:57:17 · answer #1 · answered by LegendMan 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If someone suffering from clinicl retardation there will probably be no trial at all for that person. It's pretty much a waste of time and money at the expense of tax payers. Besides, in order to stand trail a person must be in their right mind. The person in question is not eligable for trial. If he prson is a threat to himself or others he'll be placed in an institution for treatment and observation. Your question is silly and in very bad taste.
2007-04-24 06:01:11 · answer #2 · answered by josh03 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would not be tried like everyone else. They might be sent to a state mental hospital if they are found to be violent. They can't just be left out in public.
2007-04-24 05:54:19 · answer #3 · answered by Ryan's mom 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The families of the retard should be held responsible for his action. They raised the retard to set him off in public on his killing spree.
2007-04-24 05:53:35 · answer #4 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, he or she should be given a fair trial and that is to be fair to the victim's family and the community at large!
2007-04-24 05:53:27 · answer #5 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She should only be found guilty if she actually is guilty.
2007-04-24 05:52:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why, who did you kill?
2007-04-24 05:53:59 · answer #7 · answered by Louis G 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋