Barak won the first round. He will be rested and put against another winner.
2007-04-24 05:43:02 · 15 answers · asked by Martin R 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Rudy Guiliani would win hands down.
2007-04-24 22:56:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton. I think that Rudy is going to implode. His social stands are going to kill him in the end. I know that many Republicans are willing to forgive him those stands in light of his strong image from 9/11. But they are only going to be willing to do so if he doesn't rail on about them - and he's already started. Last week he said (paraphrasing of course) that "I'm pro-choice and if there are people who won't vote for me because of it, well then so be it." He's going to have to watch being too arrogant about those liberal social stands. Plus, once the nominations are in place, the firefighters and police officers of New York, who as a bloc do NOT support him, are going to come out swinging about 9/11 and that positive image is going to get tarnished.
2007-04-24 06:41:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's frightening to realize that Timothy M is correct in that Hilliary is the more conservative of she and Barak Obama.
Sheesh! The runoff will probably be Hilliary and Rudy.
2007-04-24 05:48:43 · answer #3 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought Guiliani was Republican and Clinton was Democrat. Did they have the primaries when I wasn't looking? Got to hate those little naps!
2007-04-24 05:50:00 · answer #4 · answered by Jim 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Rudy would be the better president, Hillary already has the KFC special named after her...you know the 2 small breasts, 2 large thighs and a left wing...lol, at least Rudy isn't married to a Rhodes Scholar that needs a judge to define sex for them.
2007-04-24 05:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by johnkmayer 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i think of this is approximately time we flow into the 21 century in someways we are nonetheless far in the back of for what we ought to continuously be in this u . s .. the U. S. has nonetheless no longer had a women persons president or a black president, all our presidents have been white adult men. I now and lower back think of that persons right here interior the united statesdo no longer elect to interrupt the cycle of all white adult men basically presidents and are nonetheless no longer waiting for the exchange. in case you stop and picture approximately it the girls persons have been working some countries for years or centuries like in England it has continuously been a queen. So I save hoping that sometime we finally end up having the two a women persons for president or having a black guy like Colin Powell or Jesse Jackson who i understand did run for president a pair of times wich exchange into earlier my time reason i exchange into to youthful to bear in mind. there are various first women that could have been good presidents like Eleanor Roosevelt exchange right into a good first woman from what I even have examine and could have probably made a good president, yet besides I basically wish sometime to work out the exchange in existence.
2016-10-13 09:12:05 · answer #6 · answered by morabito 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudy Guiliani all the way. Go Rudy!!!
2007-04-24 05:48:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Rudy Giuliani becuase he's a man.
2007-04-24 09:08:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudy, Rudy, Rudy
2007-04-24 05:50:20 · answer #9 · answered by Shortstuff13 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither! As the race heats up, the scene will keep changing and eventually there could be outsiders as winners to represent both the parties!
2007-04-24 05:48:10 · answer #10 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋