Democrats would rather lose the war and shame America then lose the Presidency. God help us.
2007-04-24 05:12:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by pms 4
·
2⤊
8⤋
Generally I'd pick the war but that depends a bit
on who would be in office then. Bush's of the table
but if it would be Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz or Cheney
I'd pick the presidency or whatever choice #2 would
be. Doesn't make much sense to cheat yourself
through one war and then get two or three more.
2007-04-24 14:33:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alex S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If we lose the presidency we will lose the war, because it will continue on if another republican is brought into office, However We will never win in Iraq, we have already lost so much, what are we over there for anyway oh yeah oil, oh my bag democracy, we can't even achieve that on our own soil, so what will become of Iraq.
2007-04-24 12:27:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kbella 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Lose the Presidency and win in Iraq. Definitely.
2007-04-24 12:09:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
How do you define "win"? Is leaving the Iraqi government to fend for themselves winning? Is keeping the number of deaths to a minimum winning? Is avoiding an attack on American soil winning? Or do you really expect us to kill every person that plans on killing other people?
2007-04-24 12:15:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by 12 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
If Democrats won the Presidency then the US could win in Iraq because we wouldn't have President Dip Stick II screwing things up anymore.
2007-04-24 12:11:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Columb H 2
·
7⤊
3⤋
Definition of "win in Iraq" needed before such questions can be answered. It's not a sports event.
2007-04-24 12:13:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
We have lost the war already according to the Democrats.
We have won the war already according to the Republicans.
Democrats will win the presidency, Bush fatique and the inept bumblings of the republican administration ensure that.
.
2007-04-24 12:12:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
You have to define your terms before I can answer this question. What does "win in Iraq" mean? When will this "winning" happen?
2007-04-24 12:11:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
1⤋
I don't understand the question. We are not winning the war now so how can the republican leadership ensure that? Right now, if one was smart, they would vote for CHANGE, since we are on a LOSING strategy with the president administration.
2007-04-24 12:11:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by withluv7 3
·
7⤊
2⤋
win in iraq.. once they were helped then we would have one more aly to help us hopefully when it comes closer to the end of the world..
2007-04-24 14:34:47
·
answer #11
·
answered by Americasgirl 3
·
0⤊
1⤋