There is none.
2007-04-24 04:42:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You could probably dream up evidence against a spherical earth (It's roughly spherical). There are mountains of evidence for evolution and very little contradictory evidence. Those who believe in some sort of magical devine creation point to lack of intermediate forms but the fact is unless you have a documentation of every species, there will always be gaps in the fossil record. The gaps have to do mostly with geology. Another reason that transitional forms are rare is that contrary to popular opinion, evolution can happen relatively quickly. It is only when an animal is already fairly well adapted to a niche does the evolution slow down. I am talking on a geological scale. Evolution cannot be witnessed very easily in one lifetime. Evolution is one of the few theories that has so much evidence for it that it almost is accepted as a fact like plate techtonics in geology.
2007-04-24 11:43:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by JimZ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are plenty of websites spouting "evidence" against evolution, unfortunately they rely on non-scientific methods to obtain their "facts". I would say your problem isn't finding those sites since you need help in spelling "againest". I don't think there is a word in the English Language that means "superlatively again".
2007-04-24 15:43:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Amphibolite 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Look at the significant number of people do not understand evolution. don't believe everything those sci-fi people tell you. for instance one tried to tell me that babies came from f*** around in bed. no way, it is the hand of God, and i am not paying child support for his handiwork.
2. Entropy, complex forms break down eventually to make simpler and not the other way around. man had to be created first, where else could worms have come from?
3. Follow the money and you can easily show this is a scam. bibles you can get free in any hotel room. But the so-called scientific text books with evolution in them that our tax money has to buy are 50 bucks a pop.
4. Conspiracy. darwin was a member of the knights templar and a quadrilateralist.
2007-04-25 17:34:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by lare 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Incredibly bad science!!!! You do not set out to prove or disprove but to discover the truth.
Sadly bad Christians tend to ask such questions because they seek to hide from the truth.
Even the Pope last week recognised evolution but pointed out that since it took place over millions of years full proof is unlikely to be found.
Trying to deny evolution is futile as there are so many fully proven evolutionary steps in animals that can easily be done over and over again.
Perhaps Christians think God was not clever enough to produce an evolutionary system!
2007-04-24 13:00:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I never "found" any evidence against it but,I do think most of what I hear on the subject is true.I recently heard something about bees "dying" and that it would throw off the balance of nature bringing human life to near Extinction.
2007-04-24 12:05:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by roche14522 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes there are some great sites out there. I don't think it's bad science to disprove something. I think it's bad science when you stick your head up your butt and refuse to believe that MAYBE there really is a creator behind all this perfection...
www.evolutiondeceit.com
2007-04-27 09:25:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ninja Showdown 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe you could ask Charles Darwin, who is long dead, or is he?
2007-04-24 11:47:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋