What happened to all of the impeachment hearings that the President was going to face?

Question

when the libs took over. We are still waiting! What happened, they couldn't find any charges that warrant impeachment?

Answer 1

Since the majority of crimes are being committed by the liberals in DC, like Damascus Nancy, they really dont want to attempt to come up with a charge worthy of impeachment against Bush. Where's their promised 5 day work week?

Answer 2

First of all, as other have said, the platform was not to seek impeachment. Second, the dems have only been in control of congress for four months and it is entirely possible than things will be uncovered that could lead to censure or possibly impeachment. I don't know if you are old enough to remember Watergate, but that took longer than Four Months to unfold.

And articles of impeachment are being drawn up against Cheney right now.

And people who are saying there was no wrongdoing that might warrant impeachment have no basis to say that other than there own opinion.

Answer 3

They're going after Cheney instead:
A spokeswoman for Kucinich, the most liberal member of the 2008 Democratic presidential candidate class, confirmed the congressman's plans but would not discuss why Kucinich was bringing up the impeachment articles now.

According to The Washington Post blog The Sleuth, Kucinich actually crafted the articles of impeachment before the Virginia Tech massacre, but held off introducing them immediately after the mass shooting.

Answer 4

I don't think that "impeachment hearings" were ever on the table. I recall hearing one Senator, Sen. John Conyers, mention the fact that impeachment should be pursued . There are indeed many things that Bush could be impeached for, hell they found impeachment of Clinton based on a BJ !!! All the Bushies should take notice that the Demies are trying to conduct real business instead of spending time and money impeaching Bush/Cheney!!!

Answer 5

there is in simple terms no element. notwithstanding if it have been given previous the abode, no way in hell might they get the two/3 supermajority interior the Senate mandatory to convict, so why subject? The time and the attempt mandatory might additionally distract too plenty from efforts to maintain the Republican nominee out of workplace next term, and can alienate a good factor of the swing-electorate the Dems possibly might desire to get their candidate interior the White abode. upload to that the sorrowful fact that a majority of the DEMS voted to authorize using stress, given their very own craven interpretation of BushCo.'s lies, and one might desire to end it incredibly is a finished non-starter. i think of at ultimate we will get some investigations into allegations of wrongdoing if a Dem. gets elected Pres. i does not inevitably assume that Bush may be on the magnificent of the record of those investigated, and if the Dem's are clever, they're going to bypass after the smaller fry systematically to construct a case against the better-score contributors of Bush's admin., perhaps getting a number of them to tutor on their superiors and spill the beans so they might shop their very own skins. even though it incredibly is a protracted shot. The Pubs have shown astounding self-discipline retaining the lid on, i think of partly because of fact the few dissenters who've parted techniques with them, like John DiIulio, have been given a serious seem at BushCo.'s revenge gadget, and felt compelled to retract. all and sundry else knows to think of three times earlier they utter a peep of grievance, much less cough up incriminating info. They run a good deliver. The mob might desire to benefit a factor or 2 from that bunch approximately retaining individuals "dependable".

Answer 6

There up to 82 at this point. I like the German intelligence that testified about Mohamed Atta. Looks like Bush lied on that Saddam meeting with Atta thing also. The Germans had Atta under 24-7 surveillance. He never went to Czechoslovakia to meet with Saddam Saddams son or Saddams agents.

Don't you ever read the News. If you didn't have you head up your FOX all the time you could check the Congressional Record to see what is going on in Congress.

Go Team Bush Go

And this happened since you asked

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0704/S00426.htm

Answer 7

shows you clearly don't listen. Democrats stated even before the past election that impeachment was off the table, but that wouldn't stop investigations, which you see going on now.

Answer 8

Same old , same old. All talk no action. They want what is best for their party and not the country. They are willing to pronounce anything to get more power to achieve their ultimate socialistic goals.
The far left is leading the liberal march. They are being herded like sheep. The liberals of our country do not realize they are patronizing the ultra-left wing and doing their bidding.

Answer 9

Its all for show but they could never fine any wrong doing the Iraq war was never illegally because the senate voted for it and so did the house before there was a liberal congress but it seems the senate forgot about that its sad really.

Answer 10

Lack of evidence... The Democratic politicans never said they would impeach, that was the commie whackos on Yahoo.