sure
2007-04-24 02:20:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mag 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No I wouldnt, not because I think Bush isnt a bad president, its that in real life, the president is just another guy who is doing and saying what he is told. He really doesnt make any decisions for the U.S., his advisors and the government officials do, he is just here for the ride. It all started with the fact that the people of America needed to have a person, a face that they would automatically know who he is, and trust his word. Talking about George Washington here.
So George Washington was the first president that was really a soldier and a real brutal one at that. He was almost like a freakin pirate with the way he killed the enemy and took everything, but he also knew how to talk, he was very well educated, so he was perfect. Someone who was a soldier, a well decorated one at that, who was very articulate and knowledged. That is where the first president came into play, now I think they just go with who has a good name.
But there hasnt been a single president who was actually running anything except for his own personal life, and even that is changed by his advisors and officials. Bush honestly is just another guy who fell for it and is now the voice and opinion of America, but really he is just the voice.
2007-04-24 02:27:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by David K 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. He has been President in one of the hardest stretches of time that any president has ever been in. He has certainly made some mistakes, but overall I think he got us through some really bad times. His actions have kept any more September 11th's from happening. If he had not pushed to take care of Afghanistan and Iraq, we would have probably been attacked again, and everyone would want him impeached for not taking action. So he has been in a lose-lose situation and I think he has done well with it.
2007-04-24 02:24:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by McClintock 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No such petition has any benefit or foundation, in accordance to our shape. i does no longer sign it for one reason: President Bush did no longer wiretap human beings and not utilising a court docket-issued warrant. He did no longer ruin any regulation. for this reason, the difficulty of impeachment is null and void.
2016-12-16 14:08:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Leave the man alone. He was and is just trying to do a job most people would screw up because we are not of one mind....You will never please everyone and the President sure cant either.
2007-04-24 02:25:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dixie 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
After we impeach Cheney.
2007-04-24 02:21:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
honestly if i thought anyone else could do better yes.i consider myself a republican but Bush has dropped the ball.on gas prices especially-i know the people in Washington dont live in the real world-but he has to know how the prices are affecting the economy and affecting the people who work hard and are the backbone of this country/
2007-04-24 02:22:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by DS9ST 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Definitely, Hugo Chavez has got to go, he's ruining Venezuela!
2007-04-24 02:21:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That depends on whether or not the president has done something to damage our country.
2007-04-24 02:22:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by sheavy 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, cause those online don't count. Gotta go in person to the legislatures. But please feel free to do that. I insist if you feel this way. Government NEEDS involved citizens.
2007-04-24 02:22:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by SALSA 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope.
2007-04-24 02:21:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋