Wow, if they had a real reason instead of just a marital infidelity! Bush, I mean, Clinton would be out on his rear circa early 2004, the time when people began leaking that the war on Iraq was based on lies.
2007-04-24 02:04:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I will repeat. WJClinton was interviewed regarding a sexual assault charge by police investigators. He lied about his involvement. He lied again. Now he was an Attorney and President so he knows the law. He was impeached for interrupting this thing we call due process. Because he was President and a lawyer. He was disbarred for his actions by the Supreme Court. Impeachment is a long process... lots of money and little time to ward off bad guys on track to hit US soil.
SO, if u do some of your own homework under Clinton we lost over 4,000 soldiers? But who is counting. NY Sun Heroes & Cowards . Clinton-Executive Orders, search engine ...
Rose Law Firm, Whitewater??? For a lawyer he was not too
good at following laws. I forget they re write their own.
Now, a cabinet, not really, but post as Good Will Ambassador before Hills in even yet? Chelsea on the campain train now. God help us all.
Did Bill Clinton start this war? Who knows. My opinion he did not a darn thing to stop it.
2007-04-24 02:11:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes. Our government is run by a bunch of selfish, child like brats. It is partly the fault of the American people though. After all, aren't the elections a reflection of us? If Americans as a whole would step up and run the career politicians and the sleazy ones out of office then our gov't would work better. It would actually be for the people and of the people.
2007-04-24 02:31:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by MI 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Never. But I do find it sick that the Democrats in Congress today are deliberately damaging our relations with Turkey, key allies in the War by condemning Turkey for something that happened in the early 20th century even though congress has already condemned that action twice before.
2016-05-17 10:06:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very good point. If the Democrats and Clinton had started this war, the Republicans sure wouldn't be supporting it now! Repubs want to continue this stupid war for political reasons, nothing more.
2007-04-24 02:06:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by abdiver12 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bill Clinton did not start the war, but Osama bin Laden declared war on the US in 1998. So a state of war existed, at least on one side.
2007-04-24 02:03:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
first off, bush did NOT start this war...the islamofascists did...perhaps you may remember a little incident that occurred on sept. 11 2001?...and all through clinton's presidency, attack after attack went unanswered and all clinton could do is pretend it wasn't happening and he even went so far as to avoid getting involved because he didn't want to dirty his 'legacy' with a legitimate military action... i say legitimate because as everyone now knows, kosovo was always and only to take the focus off him for getting lewinskyed in the oval office.
this war is happening now as a direct result of clinton's inability to deal effectively with the situation he KNEW was vitally important and passed it on to bush. bush thankfully, is a republican and did what was necessary...finally.
2007-04-24 02:13:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
If only King George would get a BJ from his mistress Condie Rice then he could be impeached too. If that's all it takes.
2007-04-24 02:08:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bill Clinton doesn't have the balz to start a war...he didn't have them to catch osama...so i would say NO to your question...
2007-04-24 02:18:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by turntable 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bill Clinton is as responsible for these problems as any individual can be. His years of inaction are what got us to this point.
2007-04-24 02:10:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by libstalker 4
·
2⤊
2⤋