I'd like to think that if women ruled the world that it would be a much kinder place. I cannot imagine a woman storing a large quantity of food, if her neighbors kids were starving. I cant imagine women sending anyone to fight a war, I cant imagine women creating weapons of mass destruction.
2007-04-23 21:40:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
It is said that the races, and men and women, take turns being in power on this world. The last time women were in power. There were some who were noble, and treated men as equals. The majority of women could have cared less about men until they had a need, just like today. And the worst was the Amazon Society. They killed the male children, and only kept enough for breeders and slaves.
Most of the struggles we go through today, are
karmic. Because of things done in the past. But we
make choices in the Here and Now too. So we can entertain the Devil, with hateful talk against each other, and be unhappy. Or wise up.
2007-04-24 00:09:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Eye 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
If we followed the practice of the Six Nations, all important decisions are taken by a council of the grandmothers. They elect the chief and they can also depose him.
A very wise system. The grandmothers have the interests of the community at heart and they have the wisdom to see past petty squabbles.
I can only think this would be an improvement on our testosterone-driven planet. No woman wants to lose her husband, brothers, and sons in war. And women have a natural ability to co-operate, they are the ones who form the basis of all humanitarian relief agencies.
2007-04-24 01:58:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it would be awesome. there would be significantly less wars because we have better things to do with our time and money. woman are kinder and less competitive then men. men always feel they need to prove their manhood.us woman are comfortable with just being ourselves and we don't have the need to prove ourselves if we ruled of course. things would be a bit more emotional though but who knows that could be a good thing since we are loving nurturing people, and want to help rather then hurt.
2007-04-23 21:48:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd like to think it would be a better place - free from poverty, war, suffering and the wanton destruction of our planet. But Thatcher was a woman (apparently) so that blows that point of view out the water.
2007-04-23 21:44:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by derbyandrew 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Femininized. Some traits I see now of femininism dominating is lack of real fathers (they're either in jail or moved in with someone else), males acting more feminine, females having more clout in courts of law.
The only area where women haven't dominated the landscape completely is in business.
Although the "good ole boys" network promoted females (especially those who climbed the ladder horizontally), women in high official capacity aren't paid as much as men.
With equal opportunity, we now see where women make their own determination as to when to marry, have children and contribute towards providing support as much as men do.
I was not one of the fortunate ones that had a woman paying my freight.
2007-04-23 21:44:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
So much better - not. Look at the likes of Elizabeth I, Victoria, Indira Gandhi, Thatcher...
2007-04-23 23:10:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by gortamor 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
There would be no open wars. On the other hands, we'd probably be having not less than a half dozen Cold Wars going on at the same time...
2007-04-23 21:41:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by San La Muerte 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Who cares? I think it would be fine.
Although, we would probably have less wars since women have more of a heart.
2007-04-23 21:41:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cassandra S. 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Women would have to make time to rule, in between doing their nails, gossiping, watching soaps, gossiping, fantasizing about men, shopping, gossiping ,etc.
2007-04-23 23:44:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by squirrel 1
·
0⤊
1⤋