George Soros is their bank; he spends millions on Move On dot Org and filters money to Media Matters among various other left wing organizations - including the Center for Islamic American Relations. The left constantly decries the contributions of the wealthy - why the hypocrocy?
2007-04-23 18:19:50 · 9 answers · asked by netjr 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
you know... whats good for the goose.....
Holy cow this came out wrong.... I am actually in agreance with you. My point being... a do what I say.... and though it may be good for you too.. you don't get that priviledge.
It was really late when I answered this question... duh...
2007-04-23 18:23:29 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I love the misinformation that the reactionaries here spread about George Soros.
For the record, with that same money you're so worried about, he funded the core of Solidarity in Poland. You do remember what happened in Poland, don't you? And that's not all he did.
Every time I hear someone talk about that draft dodging idiot Ronald Reagan, I want to bitchslap the fool and remind him or her that without the goodwill and direct intervention of men like Soros, the Berlin Wall would most likely still be standing.
2007-04-24 01:40:38 · answer #2 · answered by Floyd G 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
so... if liberals did it (stop donating so much)... you would do it?
hahaha... thanks for the laugh...
and you mention millions... politics is billions... millions can make a dent... but it's no where near being a "bank"... and those things you mention aren't even campaign contributions... but I'm sure he makes those too...
I think liberals just want the system to stop being about who can raise the most money, and instead be about the better candidate... on both sides... back to the issues...
but if you're playing football and the other side is wearing pads... you better put on your pads too, or you're going to lose... you can't always survive on your ideas alone...
ideas are nice, but if all is lost upholding those ideas... they won't matter in the end...
2007-04-24 02:03:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's got to be Bi-partisan. Why should the Democrats cripple themselves and not take campaign funds from Soros if the Republicans are still going to take money from just about every oil company on earth, big tobacco, trial lawyers and the NRA just to name a few. If one side gives up lobbyists money, BOTH sides have to. We should ALL want for that to happen in which case, it would truly put the power back in the hands of the PEOPLE!!
2007-04-24 01:29:05 · answer #4 · answered by sellout7s 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its funny how many people hate George Soros, In Indonesia they blame him for the huge economic down fall in Asia during the 90's. He's not good anywhere it seems. I have not heard anything good about him.
2007-04-24 01:45:14 · answer #5 · answered by danielseti 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny, I was just reading about that after:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,267832,00.html
'Factor Investigation': George Soros
This guy is dangerous and he is running the liberal media. Now it all makes sense doesn't it. His Billions and all the robot followers.
Check out George Soros Philosphy, it's thick to read, but interesting.
2007-04-24 01:25:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think you misunderstood. They only want to limit campaign contributions when they can't raise as much money as the republican candidates.
2007-04-24 01:31:32 · answer #7 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Definitely. Why is someone who is not even American allowed to effect our politics like this? He is the lefts true leader.
2007-04-24 01:28:58 · answer #8 · answered by inzaratha 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That would not make sense for the party of "Do as I say, not as I do"..
2007-04-24 01:23:45 · answer #9 · answered by jonepemberton 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋