some say they should blame the police and even the principle, but i dont think that any one should be blame
2007-04-23 18:14:16 · 15 answers · asked by lababygurlat707 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
In the end it is the gunman's fault and doing. He is the one holding the guns and taking lifes. Now I do feel that more could have been done to warn the other students but from what I understand they did what they felt was the right thing to do at the time.
2007-04-23 18:32:39 · answer #1 · answered by vixen 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The gunman is to blame. But this kind of thing does show some flaws in the universities crisis system. There are somethings that need to be approved upon but no one is to blame. Its not everyday that some guy kills two people in one building gets away and comes back two hours later and kills 30 more people on the other side of campus.
2007-04-24 01:24:40 · answer #2 · answered by MJMGrand 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clearly, the gunman.
When someone was to commit an evil act and he has his mind set to it, then there is no turning back. He wanted to do it; therefore, he did it.
One cannot hold V/T responsible. No one has a crystal ball to know what will be. Parent/sibling/family is NOT responsible either because I guarantee you that this is a normal Korean family just living in America. These people are good with good ethics and killing was NOT taught at home.
No matter what the Goo Gai Pan thought or what we think, it is only the fault of one that this crime occurred and HE is now dead. Thank the Lord.
2007-04-24 01:30:48 · answer #3 · answered by Karen 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Immigration Department
Close The Boarders
2007-04-24 02:05:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about the guy who did the shooting. We are all responsible for our own actions. Unless the guy was certifiably insane, which from the descriptions of what he did leading up to the shooting leads me to think he was not. It takes a cold calcuating person to do what he did in the manner he did it in. Some people are just evil. Take David Koresh or Charles Manson for example. No group, or individual other than them is to blame for what they did, they were just evil men who did terrible things. So is this guy.
2007-04-24 01:32:34 · answer #5 · answered by John W 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Handgun Legislation - I don't advocate for the removal of handguns from the private citizen, but for harder requirements.
He was able to buy the gun b/c he had not been convicted of a felony. If it showed that he was ordered to a mental hospital for evaluation and the sign out showed the "possible danger to himself and others" being checked, maybe that's a sign that he shouldn't own a firearm.
If this was part of the background check, perhaps he wouldn't been able to obtain the firearm legally.
2007-04-24 03:09:05 · answer #6 · answered by dude 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that the kid that did it should be blamed but also the fact that people had told the police that this man was a danger to himself and others means that they have some responsibility in this too.
2007-04-24 01:23:57 · answer #7 · answered by Nedalexis4ever 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the killer was to blame.. shouldnt blame noone else. ok say i was to just go out and committ a massive killing spree ive never been psycho evaluated or faced a judge in my life. who would they blame it on. all democrats look for a way to screw everyone when the fault is always right there in front of their eyes.
2007-04-24 01:19:40 · answer #8 · answered by reddragon21321 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion there's only one person who holds all the blame for this incident: the killer. No one else is at fault but him. He bought the guns, he pulled the trigger, he killed those people.
2007-04-24 01:22:55 · answer #9 · answered by pvpd73127 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. WE are to blame... Every time we ignore & hurry past someone who makes us feel alittle "uncomfortable"- WE could be "to blame" for the V.T. Shooter- or perhaps, the NEXT one... "Speed"- is not the ONLY thing that kills...-so does FEAR... :(
2007-04-24 01:24:51 · answer #10 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋