because he could not do well with bangladesh and then did not allowed to play with bermuda where india got more chances to win and then again he is in team when palying with sri lanka which has more caliber than previous both opponents, and selectors should know kumble performed well with bermuda so why not he continued or let harbhajan play with bermuda to gain his confidence......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-04-23 14:49:42 · 8 answers · asked by CiscoPal 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
that's the funny thing with Indian cricket. Let's forget it yaar, Past is past. Wait for the coming sunshine from Indian cricket
2007-04-23 21:19:07 · answer #1 · answered by Bulty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I also strongly feel that Anil Kumble should have played in the match against Sri Lanka instead of Harbhajan Singh.
2007-04-23 21:58:48 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude,the reason india could't qualify to the second round is because they did't play well(And fixed matches),not because of Harbajan not playing bermuda game...
Why not to focus on the main fixing issue?
2007-04-23 23:05:45 · answer #3 · answered by Ali 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same question can be asked for all the 11 players played that match.
2007-04-23 22:08:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cricket is a team sport ( if u know the rules of the game) so blaming one person for the entire teams loss is unfair
i would blame the entire team for not playing well
Indian cricket team sucks anyways
who cares about those losers anyway
2007-04-24 00:33:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Indian team is doing time pass
2007-04-24 04:08:34 · answer #6 · answered by sergio a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is waste of taking harbhajan inspite of taking harbhajan irfan has to be given a chance
2007-04-24 03:33:28 · answer #7 · answered by rajesh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because some time he play very well in bat.
2007-04-24 04:35:00 · answer #8 · answered by ram s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋