2007-04-23 14:35:12 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, we would not pull out. We would run as fast as possible with deep apology for opposing terrorist. That was his strategy in Somalia and is key reason we were attacked on 9-11. He believe we should always run from conflict on the ground and he gets great credit for emboldening the terrorists to see that America is a cowardly nation just as when we ran out of Vietnam; indeed, he and his Democratic brethren still inspire Iran that soon US choppers will be leaving from Iraqi rooftops so just hang on and you will rule the mideast and murder pro-American people in Iraq.
2007-04-23 14:46:27 · answer #1 · answered by Lighthearted 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bill Clinton isn't known for pulling out of anything early.
2007-04-23 21:40:26 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Bill Clinton were president we wouldn't be in this mess.
2007-04-23 21:42:18 · answer #3 · answered by Ethernaut 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes
2007-04-23 21:38:46 · answer #4 · answered by Nobody Special 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, we do not. We would have done so long ago, and genocide would be rampant now in what was left of Iraq.
2007-04-23 21:41:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If only it were true...we'd never be in this mess. Brother Bill knew the best way to deal with radical arab leaders was on the phone while enjoying a good.....cigar!!!
2007-04-23 21:45:59 · answer #6 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
... he would have just stood in kuwait and lobbed bombs like an aggravating misquito.. Which would have really ticked the middle east off. THen he would have denied it.
2007-04-23 21:42:21 · answer #7 · answered by coco d 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think we would be in Iraq.
2007-04-23 21:49:49 · answer #8 · answered by ghc5417 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if he were president we wouldnt have been there at all. we would just be attacking countries that have attacked us.
2007-04-23 21:44:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋