English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-23 14:10:37 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

To all those who give the thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks.

Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with plastic box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, (a man on dialysis hiding in a cave half way around the world) out smarted the CIA, FBI, NSA, FAA, The Pentagon, NORAD and our Multi Trillion Dollar High Tech Military by crashing 4 planes without any intervention.

The following is irrefutable:

FACT: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI web site. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care if we catch him or not.

FACT: There are hundreds of televised claims from the morning of the attacks saying that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, news reporters, security guards, employees of the WTC and civilians.

FACT: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a concrete and steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically at free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as DEMOLITION. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7.

FACT: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence and malpractice in the history of forensics.

FACT: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.

FACT: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24 A.M, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Shanksville Penn. NORAD has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. The Bush Administration changed their story several times. We must also look at the fact that President Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the morning of the attacks.

FACT: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families and the loss of their loved ones.

FACT: No one has been fired for the failures of 9/11.

FACT: Right before the attack a spike in “put options” on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines increased dramatically and was never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates people knew in advance. Why didn’t the FBI check out these leads?

FACT: In August 6, 2001 A Public Daily Briefing Memo that was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US was brought forward. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?

FACT: When the United States is under attack the first measure is to secure the President.
The entire nation knew 2 weeks in advance that President Bush would be at Booker Elementary Grade School. Why did his body guards and secret service men let him remain at this location for 20 minutes after the attack? Holding the book “My Pet Goat” upside down while he tried to address a bunch of 5th grade students?

The bottom line is - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Immediately! Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted. Since they determined the conclusion prematurely. Do you understand?

If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or an FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down, failed to requisition intervention or just plain messed up that day?

To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.

More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.

Go ahead and give this a thumbs down if your Patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.

So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your Cheap Patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a President and a Government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for Accountability, Truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 victims, their families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer the loss of their loved ones.

Peace, may the truth be brought forward and the guilty be brought to justice.

2007-04-23 14:20:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

It was NOT an inside job. Here's another way of showing it:

No engineering school, like MIT, has said the WTC was an inside job. Not one. And this is true even given the fact that Universities are generally liberal & would therefore be against Bush.

No Democrat has said it was an inside job

No Newstation, Newspaper, or investigative reporter has said it was an inside job.

Scientific American, Popular Mechanics, & Implosion World have all said it was NOT an inside job.

Now consider the credentials of those who say it was an inside job. Generally, these people are nobodies, anonymous pea-brains.

What more do you need? IT WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB.

2007-04-26 18:29:33 · answer #2 · answered by J 5 · 0 0

Here are some insights into why this war occured and who served to benefit by.

Great comments by current and retired military personnel. This is important especially for those of us who have served or who are serving and also those of you with children as someday we may see a draft reinstated and we should all be clear on what we are fighting for.

Democrats and Repubs should lay down party politics and get serious about doing the right thing so that the country’s citizens and the country’s soldiers are not put in harms way unnecessarily.Very well made documentary and a little hard to want to face.
this link shows one of a 10 part documentary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YlcpXBFOXA

WHO ELSE WANTED THIS WAR?
Our so called ALLY... that acutally attacked us many many years ago and yet the U.S. stayed hush about it.
Here is what is happening now.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/whoiscongresslisteningto.html

Read more about the cover up the attack on our naval battle ship by our so called ally.

http://www.ussliberty.org/

the paradigm shift is inevitable.

2007-04-23 21:13:24 · answer #3 · answered by Kar 3 · 1 1

How could so many people have their brains still brandnew??? The government in charge fired 9 attorneys and the Democrats, knowing that the Clinton government fired 93 attorneys, are making all this fuzz about it. Can anyone in it's right mind can even think that the Democrats would have let Bush to win the 2004 elections if they could have even a tiny little evidence or suspition that there was a conspiracy on 9-11?? How could anyone be so unbelievably stupid??

2007-04-23 22:07:09 · answer #4 · answered by Millie 7 · 2 2

Stop watching "The View" and Rosie so much. Yes, Bush wanted to kill a bunch of Americans and destory billions of dollars worth of real estate. For no personal gain what so ever. That does not count the lost revenue of those tax paying businesses to the American economy and most importantly the lost lives. You need to really put things in perspective and think for yourself.

2007-04-23 21:16:48 · answer #5 · answered by Lily 7 · 2 1

Yes, it was an inside job. I saw the films of the whole thing. The people that did it were definitely INSIDE the airliners.

Have you ever looked at the outside of a jetliner up close? There is NOTHING to hold onto. They had to be inside it.

2007-04-23 21:15:02 · answer #6 · answered by open4one 7 · 5 2

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! 9/11 was done by terrorists.....I know it's scary to know that there are people out there evil enough to commit murder on that scale but they're out there and they need to be stopped!!!! These theories make me nuts...........AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.....take a bite of the reality cake people!!!!!

I'm sorry....i'm finished now.

2007-04-27 11:41:25 · answer #7 · answered by lxtricks 4 · 0 0

Elvis Presley and Princess Diana.

Good grief - there are so many real problems - let's focus on solving something we can do something about. Terrorists attacked our nation and that's the beginning and end of the story.

2007-04-23 21:16:44 · answer #8 · answered by .. .this can't be good 5 · 5 1

By AL Queada. Other than that NO!!!!!!!!!!!! Quit asking people.

Edit - Moche prove it with actual fact, not "Loose Change" not the Professor of Theology that is mascaraing as an expert, not the lady who specializes in dental implants who is passing herself off as a structural engineer. Not by the Scholars for 9/11 truth who have less than 1% who specialize in structural issues. Please, I beg you to show me the error of my ways.

2007-04-23 21:13:39 · answer #9 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 3 3

Not a chance! Stop listening to wackos like Rosie O'Donnell - she's nuts

2007-04-23 21:17:09 · answer #10 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers