Yes, because there is now a stench hanging over the Justice Department and unless he can come up with an industrial sized can of "lie neutralizer(aka as the truth)", he should resign.He is in a lot of trouble. He was not truthful when he was under oath in Jan which is what started this whole thing and he did not clarify or clear up the "untruths from his last visit"
The backstory to all of this is when he was on the hill in Jan, he swore under oath that he knew nothing about the firings. He also swore that the new US attorney nominees would be presented to Congress for vetting. Then along came the emails. The ones that showed he knew about the firings and that he knew a provision was snuck into the Patriot Act last year which changed the law to allow them to appoint US attorneys without getting approval from the Senate. why did he lie about that? Only he knows. I think it is because of one of the appointees. The Karl Rove protege, Tim Griffin. He claimed he had prosecuted 40 cases. He is 33 years old. Come to find out he NEVER prosecuted one case, he assisted in 3 all of which were plea deals. Yet he was supposed to be the TOP attorney for a state. He would never have been able to withstand the scrutiny and if he is willing to lie to get the job, what else would these "wet behind the ears" replacements lie about while in these positions. I mean this is a job where the US attorney can take your children, your house, your freedom.
Most if not all of the replacements that they hoped to have placed came from one very interesting source.- Pat Robertson's university, this also included the recently resigned Monica Goodling who was also supposed to get a top posting. Go figure
He was given an opportunity to save himself by clearing up the discrepancies. From what I saw, he just dug himself a deeper hole. Shame
2007-04-23 12:58:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
No, he shouldn't resign by way of fact of political tension. He did not something incorrect as each and every AG has fired political appointees and each appointee is conscious that they serve on the excitement of the president. All presidents interior the previous have executed this by way of their AG. that is all a synthetic scandal by utilising the political opposition and that i'm stunned that the media participates in such political nonsense by utilising reporting it. i'm apolitical. In Christ Fr. Joseph
2016-11-26 23:47:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by gallop 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would rather see him fired. He doesn't deserve the opportunity to resign.
2007-04-23 12:59:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by DAKal 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes.
Do I think he will?
No. Not unless there is some advantage in it for Bush.
2007-04-23 13:52:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes
2007-04-23 12:59:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by j _j_83221 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
No
2007-04-23 13:08:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't recall.
2007-04-23 14:57:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by MOJADO 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, he did nothing illegal.
2007-04-23 13:00:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by duckkillerdan 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO///
2007-04-23 13:01:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by BUTCH 5
·
1⤊
1⤋