Stones. Any band can make a record and sell them. But it takes a real band to perform on stage. The Stones make more off their tours than they do off of record sales and royalty funds. The Beatles stopped performing on stage early in their career because they knew they weren't very good at it. And their sets were only around ten minutes long. 40 years later, I just paid over $100 to see Mick and the boys and it was one of the best shows I've ever seen. And it was over two hours long. Says allot for a bunch of guys old enough to be retired.
2007-04-23 11:23:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr. E. Bunny A.K.A. Andy. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Beatles. There's no one else like them. I like the Rolling Stones a lot too but they're not as original as The Beatles.
2007-04-23 18:20:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by meg (on Violet Hill) 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lots of people like the Beatles, and I am one of them. Their music is better than The Rolling Stones.
2007-04-23 19:43:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by xojj4lyfexo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Stones baby! Never been a Beatles fans.
2007-04-23 18:23:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Q.London 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Rolling Stones are much more of a true rock band.
The Beatles music becomes tedious after 3 songs.
2007-04-23 18:22:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Kid 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've always appreciated the music of the Rolling Stones over the Beatles since they first came to the States.
I like the rock n' roll beat of the Stones over the lyrics of the 'Silver Beatles'.
2007-04-23 18:21:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Stones rule and are a rock.
The Beatles is ok at best.
2007-04-23 18:25:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shazam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Beatles. I liked their songs better, although Stones had some good ones too.
2007-04-23 18:21:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by macybluedawn 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Beatles their sound is more mellow. I've never cared much for the Stones
2007-04-23 18:22:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lisa C 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Beatles, just because.
2007-04-23 18:20:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋