i think nate robinson
2007-04-23 10:53:05 · 9 answers · asked by elizabeth s 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Sorry, but Nate Robinson, isnt even close to YAO or SHAQ's level....Why even try to compare a 5'6 player, with two players over 7 foot.
2007-04-23 10:58:36 · answer #1 · answered by 229Time 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shaq was great but he's over the hill. Yao is currently the best player out of these guys. Although Nate Robinson did get a block on Yao...check it out on You Tube.
2007-04-23 11:07:49 · answer #2 · answered by Siddler 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nate Robinson is a flea compared to Yao and Shaq. Don't you ever put them in the same sentence again!!!!
2007-04-27 01:10:16 · answer #3 · answered by bartman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you kidding me? nate robinson is nothing but a backup. shaq and yao are the two most dominant centers in the nba, with the exception of duncan and garnet
2007-04-23 10:56:39 · answer #4 · answered by biggy smalls 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nate Robinson is powerful yet he could be extra useful if he replaced into on a extra useful team. because of the fact he's on the Knicks and not lots of individuals word him then purely remeber him for winning the Slam Dunk contest back in 06. yet he's an aggresive participant and he can shoot the ball nicely yet human beings do no longer possibly word him while he playes the sport because of the fact he gets lots of bench time. yet i think of he's powerful, human beings do merely no longer provide him of challenge.
2016-10-28 19:11:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shaq was way better when he was in his prime, and even though he isn't any more, i'd still say he's better than Robinson.
2007-04-23 10:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by 14bert14 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
really? why do you think nate is so good? cause he can dunk and is short? shaq and yao are way better than nate will ever be.
2007-04-23 11:23:22 · answer #7 · answered by what? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DEAR
SIR
I THINK YOA MING OK
GOOD LUCK AND PEACE
GOOD POST
TAKE CARE
2007-04-23 13:44:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
gotta go with shaq
2007-04-23 10:58:39 · answer #9 · answered by Alex C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋