Do you think killing an endangered species for hunt should be punished by the death penalty?

Question

Humans shouldn't be dumb enough to want to exterminate a species for money. We should just start killing these hunters off.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070423/sc_nm/russia_leopard_dc;_ylt=AloMWsuCbSn3LLsHde9hC.YDW7oF

Hunting a wild wndangered species in not evolution. Maybe you should look it up? The type of evolution you mean is what is happening to the polar bears at the ice caps... nature, not death because it looks good.

Everyone thinks it's ridiculous, well I said it once. If you know something is endangered, why would you intentionally kill it? Now that is ridiculous.

We need to exterminate the moronic so they can't breed.

License to breed, license to breed.

Answer 1

How is killing poachers going to solve anything?

It's horrible that these people are killing endangered species, but the death penalty is ridiculously extreme. Why wouldn't a human exterminate animals for money...they're cruel enough to exterminate humans for money.

And if you're sticking up for these endangered species, why don't you go ahead and stick up for those dying from genocide in Darfur. I doubt they have much say in what's going on there too. I think that's a much more important issue here.

Answer 2

i'm curious related to the dying Penalty. i've got self assurance that the kinfolk and not the courts ought to ascertain no rely if or not a guy or woman is sentenced to dying. The dying penalty isn't a deterant by way of fact so few are executed. an overall inmate on dying row i've got self assurance spends 7 years on dying row. yet in Texas the standard is merely 3.2 years. The appeals technique is concepts numbing and the fee linked with the style of penalty is even have self assurance it or not extra desirable then the fee to homestead the bum for all times.

Answer 3

I wouldn't say that it should be a death penalty. But killing an endangered species is very wrong. There's only so few of them out there that is one dies, it could effect the whole species. Instead of the hunter receiving a death penalty, he/she should recieve a number of years in prison.

Answer 4

Brilliant - the way to show somebody that killing is wrong is by killing them... you must be a genius.
BTW: those hunters have GUNS - think you can even get close? Hunting endangered species = BAD. Killing people for doing it = WORSE.

Answer 5

Although I am a pretty liberal Democrat and a true environmentalist, I do not believe we should give the death penalty to those who kill an endangered species. I do though believe they should serve some serious prison time.

But unfortunately, whether it is the death penalty or serious prison time, neither will deter this type of crime. It's sad but true....

Answer 6

oh sure. Kill a signle human and hold him,her repsonsible for the death of an entire species,
while we let major corperations lobby for rights to pollute our rivers and air while we gladly give them our money for their products.

watch, "the corperation" its a great movie. Scarier than any horror movie I've ever seen

Answer 7

Ummm... No. Just don't do it anyway. All i know is you'll get in trouble, and people don't like hunters because they're mean to animals... I hope your not a hunter, but if you are, no offense.

Answer 8

Seems very extreme. So kill hunters, should we sodomize rapists? I think jail time is a sufficient punishment for this.

Answer 9

it definately shouldnt be penalty of death for killing an endangered animal. i think they definately should get in a lot of trouble though.

Answer 10

No. That is clearly excessively cruel & unusual for that crime. Those people deserve to be punished, not executed.