Don't both Bush & Hillary have incredibly polarizing effects on the US & might it be time for a more moderate, less radical person to become the next US President?
2007-04-23 09:33:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
yes we need some one not too liberal and not too conservative that is why I think hillary shouldn't be the next president any of the other moderate canidates shall do fine
2007-04-23 09:51:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no intention of voting for Hillary in 2008. Bush is finished by then so maybe America will elect someone not such a war monger as is Bush. Bush is fighting ONLY for the rich and he doesn't care about the middle class or the poor. The middle class will be forced to pay for this out-of-control war because the rich refuse to pay their fair share. The poor can't pay for anything! Hillary, on the other hand, will work for the assertive women and not for those who are calmer and not so aggressive against the males. I have difficulty understanding the war between the sexes in America. If no one has figured it out yet, NOBODY WINS AT THESE STUPID WARS!!!!
2007-04-23 16:42:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is no radical, far from it. She is probably more of a conservative Democrat. She will be tough to beat, however the more and more I hear John Edwards speak about his views I am impressed. Should be an interesting next few months. The Repubs really have nothing so far. No one on the Repub side in the race would stand a chance against any of the Democratic candidates.
2007-04-23 17:19:37 · answer #3 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anybody except Hillary. The US would be in a world of hurt if she wins.
And if she makes Bill a world ambassador , he would travel at our expense and sell our secret to other country like he sold our missile technology to China.
2007-04-23 16:42:57 · answer #4 · answered by bbj1776 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Arrogance and ignorance doesn't approach the level of intellect needed to be a radical.
2007-04-23 16:45:20 · answer #5 · answered by Rja 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is only radical to people who are terrified of losing their special privileges. When the rubes see that they are actually gaining under her, they'll realize how wrong they were about her. And it'll only be the filthy rich who oppose her when she runs for re-election.
Of course, in order for all that to happen, she has to win first.
2007-04-23 16:39:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think the best candidate as a more moderate person would actually be Rudi Guliani.
2007-04-23 16:38:08 · answer #7 · answered by UriK 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your right I keep trying to push Fred Thompson I think he could provide that middle road leadership we need.
2007-04-23 16:41:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, the sooner the better.
2007-04-23 16:48:39 · answer #9 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hillary is not radical.
2007-04-23 16:37:21 · answer #10 · answered by Y 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋