2007-04-23 07:33:52 · 24 answers · asked by Crocomophobe 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
check both, make your distinctions, draw a conclusions and own it at first then embody it....and you'll become that which you embodied... Remember this: Love contains within itself all the joy. Joy contains within itself money as an element...for you must have supply to keep joy ongoing...Money in a contrary do have joy as a little element only...so happiness of having a money is short lived , later replaced with ongoing worries to have more and fears to lose what you have....Joy is gone. Choosing Money you neglecting bigger whole, Love,for money is element of it as anything else. So you choosing to be a small element of a bigger whole. Then you'll have difficulties to love. Very common things, classical. When you perform anything with love money comes anyway...enough to support loving attitude....Then learn how to be happy with what comes...It is easy, you just love your life fully without judgments...then you will remain joyful all the time no matter what.
2007-04-23 07:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by Oleg B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order to answer this question, I would have to say where do you find "love" and what is it? It is defined differently by different people. But we can all agree, I think, that it is something one experiences. And, like most experiences, they end as does love. Money can't buy love, but it sure can buy a lot of other experiences! Like I tell the man in my life, love is nice, but when I go to the grocery store and fill up that shopping cart, if I tell Kroger's "I love you!" and try walking out with the groceries, they are gonna arrest me! So while love is a nice and good thing to experience, I would prefer the security of money -- which will only leave when I spend it (then I can make more of it and easily replace it). Love is for the young, when you get older, you need security and companionship much more!
2007-04-23 08:16:04 · answer #2 · answered by TexasDolly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After you make around $10,000 per year (anywhere in the world) then you are surviving enough to be happy with love. So, for the majority of us on Yahoo! Answers, love is the answer. For most in Burkina Faso, they could use some more survival. That's not to say that traditional living can't cause great happiness. Think of a villager with a small farm that is keeping their family alive and happy. In this case the money would also be irrelevant. For a 13 year old girl sold into sexual slavery in Bangkok, however, money would help her get out of that situation.
2007-04-23 07:44:02 · answer #3 · answered by micahcf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For me it's MONEY!
I'm totally aware that Love is so valuable and irreplaceable, I really know that. And I haven't lived enough to say that Money can't buy happiness and all that stuff. So in my opinion, I say its Money. And I can't its BEST! No... It's like, if anyone made me choose between the two, I'd take Money.
But one can't possibly replace the other that's one thing for sure.
2007-04-23 08:12:58 · answer #4 · answered by Pinky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has been said that money is "the root of all evil." It can't buy health. It can't buy happiness. It sure can't buy love. Some of the richest people are many times very lonely.
You can put a value on cars, clothes, homes, etc... but there is no way you can put a value on love. As the commercial says, "it's priceless!"
2007-04-23 07:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by Rhett Butler 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money, don't believe in love. I believe in companionship or compatibility, but love I think is a fools fantasy. Not that there is anything wrong with it, but really when you hear people say "I love you" every day or insert the word love somewhere, you begin to think a lot of things about it. Really love is overrated.
2007-04-23 08:10:03 · answer #6 · answered by Merlyn 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money is a more basic need...if you have enough money to meet the basics of food, shelter, security...than you can only live a more satisfying life through love.
So, money is more important to a point, then Love takes over.
See Maslow's heirarchy of needs.
2007-04-23 07:41:32 · answer #7 · answered by Captain Jack 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to say money cause it's so easy. But then LOVE does conquer all, so the better would definitely be l-o-v-e.
2007-04-23 07:43:00 · answer #8 · answered by Viaa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
be practical. its MONEY. these days in love no one is true. men looking for beauty.women looking for quality. both pretending to be.
moreover, no money, no love.
with lomey u can even buy love.with love u can only lose what money u have. if u have an option love or money, go for money.
2007-04-23 07:43:36 · answer #9 · answered by vaidhee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there has to be a foundation or a base on which we can compare things...love and money are entirely different..there's no relation between them.
love is emotional and money is materialistic.
both are important.(in order to survive)
the fact is...how do you balance both of them.
:)
2007-04-23 07:38:46 · answer #10 · answered by *~Hope~* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋