2007-04-23 05:51:47 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why do the liberals need a LINK to support that they love abortion. It is one of their main focuses!
As to luxury hotels for terrorists...the way the go nuts on us for Gitmo and the conditions there...what do they expect us to keep prisoners in? They have turned OUR Federal Prisons into hotels so why not the Terrorists Prisons. That is NOT a stretch to think that liberals want to do that.
Prisons should NOT be hotels but is there ANY liberal on here who would want all the Perks" taken away from prisoners...I didn't think so!
2007-04-23 06:00:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
How wonderful to see a post from a conservative with actual statistics and a link to boot. Yes the link is from a biased standpoint but his statistics are correct or not far off. The thing is, There are no statistics on how many abortions were performed before roe v. wade. You say the babies had no say in the matter, well of course not. But it's my opinion that there is another person involved that has no say in the matter... The Father. Your looking at the number of abortions over a 33 year period. Now take a look at the global numbers, close to 1 billion reported abotions worldwide.
2016-05-17 05:47:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm I am finding a lot of web pages saying terrorists would like to blow up hotels, but none about liberals wanting to put terrorists in luxury hotels. :)
If you are referring to "detention facilities" and those being held on "suspected" terrorism, do you know what "innocent until proven guilty " means?
Look it up and get a grip.
2007-04-23 05:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow thats so mind boggling!!! The question might be when does a fetus become a baby. That is even disputed amongst christian sects. As for terrorist in luxury hotels Where is the link???
Is that some like inviting a drug addicted homosexual preacher and his male prostitute to stay at ones home???
2007-04-23 05:58:12 · answer #4 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I haven't seen that news story yet, but it's probably because I don't watch Fox News. Brilliant non sequitur by the way. I can really see the correlation between your fictitious terrorists staying in luxury hotels and abortion. What I want to know is why Conservatives want to ban abortion, but they also want to get rid of assistance to the families who can't afford the children that you want to force them to have? Is it preferable for the children to slowly and painfully starve to death in some back alley where you can't see them?
2007-04-23 06:36:16 · answer #5 · answered by Bryan H 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i have not heard anything about terrorists in luxury hotels.....except maybe bush and his administration....and maybe some wealthy corporate presidents and owners.....as far as baby killing.....pro choice folk are not for the killing of babies....we are for the quality of life of the born child.....death is not the killing of a soul, torture is....not to say that all that are tortured should die, but once one is in this world, they have the free will to die themselves, continue to be tortured or possibly help themselves through societal support......pro choicers are for the societal support it requires to help life existing.....mothers of all species have been killing their babies since the beginning of time, if they think that the environment that the child will be in is too dangerous or not life supporting.....if you put your efforts into supporting life that exists.....you will see less abortions....this is also the goal of pro choice individuals....we do not like to see a womyn in the position of having to make a decision like that.....aadoption is also an option, but what about the kids in orphanages.....let's adopt them first, then work on the newborns.....i mean really....the issue is deeper than life and death and you really need to investigate why something happens if you want to fix it.
2007-04-23 06:12:46 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Cite your information.
Last time I looked, Camp X-Ray wasn't a luxury hotel. And the places they plan on relocating the terrorist suspects won't be any better.
And what does this have to do with the abortion issue you thinly sew into your question?
2007-04-23 05:56:31 · answer #7 · answered by Floyd G 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You once again impose your ideals and morals on everyone.
innocent babies is a subjective definition and your definition is not mine, don't want an abortion don't get one but please don't feel the need to tell anyone else what to do. You would not like anyone to tell you what to do so lets keep it that way.
And there was NO REASON TO ATTACK Iraq but as a liberal I wanted to seen nothing more that mushroom clouds over Afghanistan on 9/11.
You are misinformed and misguided.
2007-04-23 05:58:57 · answer #8 · answered by meanpressure0 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because they are only sympathetic to "shocking" issues, but in my opinion, you would think murdering babies in the womb would be the most shocking of all. It cracks me up how the liberals are the loudmouths who protest issues, write "news"paper articles, broadcast their "news" on television and the general public is brainwashed to believe what they hear is the truth.....find the link please so we can shut these ignorant trash-lovers up. Oh and another thing....why should any of us support anyone else unless we solely make the decision to do so on an individual basis? It should certainly never be mandatory for us to have to give our hard earned money to some drug addict single mother (or any mother for that matter) who is too lazy to have saved money, or to stupid to work at McDonalds, or too much of a slut not to keep thier legs shut, or without a man to support her. We as a nation should NEVER be the ones supporting babies born into bad situations. We should be sterilizing people.
2007-04-23 06:00:39 · answer #9 · answered by Jimmy & Hollie R 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
You so-called PRO-lifers are so funny..and factually warped....you want to impose your will on everybody else and you 'love' and care soooo much about every combination of sperm and egg until the moment the thing comes out and your ever precious tax dollar then has to support its very existance.....
2007-04-23 05:59:43 · answer #10 · answered by conx-the-dots 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋