She says she will clean up the White House. By "clean up", does she mean "clean out" like she did when she stole the White House silverware, or "clean up" some more evidence of corruption that still exists in regards to the Clinton Administration?
2007-04-23 05:24:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To all the Clintonians, I am not a Bushbot, but this is not about Bush, so stick to the question. Nor am I ignoring the two failed terms of Clinton or his successor, and it is all too obvious that we've not had a true president since Ronald Reagan.
2007-04-23 11:51:34 · update #1
Clinton and the word 'clean' don't even belong in the same sentence.
2007-04-23 05:28:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
It could be a full time job just going around debunking all of the old Clinton b.s. stories that make the rounds on this site. It didn't happen, and I'm going to post something below that addresses this. As far as the "corruption," are you referring to the old unproven load of crap that Republicans spent millions trying to prove without one indictable offense as a result? Yeah, thought so. I love how these stories get spread around to make the Clintons look bad, when it's actually the idiots that spread this stuff that should work on their own integrity. Here ya go:
...Bush propaganda machine and the full array of Clinton haterscontinued their daily assaults on the ex-president, attacking his pardons, gifts he'd received in the White House, his proposed New York office building, and allegations that his staff had trashed the White House after leaving office.
...the stories of White House vandalism were greatly exaggerated, the claim of theft on Air Force One was pure disinformation, Clinton's gifts were not significantly larger than those of Reagan and Bush senior.
Bush's White House would leak rumors to friendly journalists, or those managing rightwing Web sites such as the Drudge Report, and the stories would quickly circulate and be taken up by the mainstream media; there would then be days of impassioned discussion, and eventually reputable newspapers such as the New York Times would publish stories deflating claims, for example, that the departing Clintonites trashed the White House or took mementos from Air Force One. Reporters looking into Clinton's last days in the White House did not find that he took any more gifts or objects from the White House than his predecessors, and
W. himself was forced to concede that there was no truth to the rumor that the Clintons had stolen items from Air Force One on their last trip. But the damage had been done, and the Bushites were able to present themselves as a "clean" and virtuous contrast to the departing Clinton administration.
http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/papers/GT2c11.htm
2007-04-23 06:13:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, given that the White House was trashed when the Clintons left office (in more ways than one), she probably thinks no one has cleaned since then.
2007-04-23 05:32:40 · answer #3 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillary belongs in prison not the White House.
2007-04-23 05:40:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If she cleans it up, maybe she will find more Rose Law Firm documents...you know...the ones under subpoena...
Maybe Sandy Berger can dump off some of those classified documents he stole from the National Archives...
2007-04-23 05:30:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Noop.. I think that you are trying to tell us that you'll be the laborer (cleaner) while she will pay you good $$ and protect you from a corrupt Administration ;-).
2007-04-23 05:38:52 · answer #6 · answered by Conan 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lord Vadar. You do speak words that make me laugh. Mrs Bill Clinton, has said so many other things. Including trying to talk southern (WTF). Let her have her moment in the Spotlight. We can show her at the Polls. Be there, Or be square.
2007-04-23 05:32:49 · answer #7 · answered by Nunya Bidniss 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It must be nice to be able to completely ignore two terms of a failed president. I want to live in your brain.
2007-04-23 05:30:43 · answer #8 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
lol, if there was any "evidence" of anything, ken starr and his republican congress lackey attack squad would have found it.. if you want to see what she was referring to, just google the words scandal, corruption and Bush and see how many hits you get.
2007-04-23 05:31:47 · answer #9 · answered by pip 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
She doesn't have a snowballs chance of winning the election, so don't worry about it.
2007-04-23 05:29:24 · answer #10 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋