2007-04-23 03:03:02 · 6 answers · asked by Didgeridude 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
thegubmit raises a good point. he's not officially part of the administration any more. Maybe that helps explain it. But he's still doing its bidding. So, change the question to "Bush camp" or "Bush regime" or whatever.
2007-04-23 03:16:28 · update #1
I'm sure he got it, he just forgot.
2007-04-23 03:07:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It amazes me how you guys can have such an affinity about truth when you were silent for 8 years with the Clinton lies. He was the guy who let Osama go 3 times. Do any of you have the dignity to even look at your failures in the past administration you supported?
You can fault Bush for many things...including Iraq but he stood up and did something. President Clinton was more worried about his popularity rating than real threats to our liberty and freedom. You people are children without the sense to look beyond what some biased socialist adult has diluted your brains with in school.
2007-04-23 10:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was the one who planned the illegal invasion of Iraq.
He qualifies.
I wonder if he had advanced knowledge of 9/11 ?
He just wants to keep his part of the power position he is in with the World Bank.
Seems that every place the people in the Bush administration goes ends up corrupted.
2007-04-27 22:39:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wolfowitz isn't in the Bush administration any more, Toto.
2007-04-23 10:12:20 · answer #4 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reality can only slap one in the face so long until it stings.
Paul must have figured out that there was no way out of his moral issue and will bow out of his current position.
Now if only other Nixon era neocons would get the picture and move off the stage.
2007-04-23 10:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by Floyd G 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What is the temp in Hell today? Has it froze over?
2007-04-23 10:06:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋