English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

FRNDS WHO IS THE BEST AMONG THESE TWO N TELL ME Y HE IS THE BEST

2007-04-23 01:14:42 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

22 answers

Shane warne is the best ever coz he is the magician wrist bowler not like chucker muralitharan
shane warnes all of the hauls are against good opponents he played very few matches against weak opponents like bangala,kenya,zimbabwe
n he proves himself the best by his credibility to bowl out any batsman
not like murali who has got most of the wickets against weaker opponents n he played more matches with them . this is the best comparison
murali is a big chucker ...........................
n he was thrown to bowl almost all of the overs from the start of the match by his captain think who will not take wicket s by bowling 40 to 50 overs in innings ,
not like murali warne will get to bowl only after his great fast bowlers mcgrath..imagine mcgrath he will definitely going to bag some wickets after that he will get the chance to bowl normally

warne has recorded his name in wisdon for his ball of the century
achievemnts
warnieeeeeeeeeeee u r the bbest

2007-04-23 21:40:18 · answer #1 · answered by Scorp _The_ Beast 2 · 0 0

Murli, Murli only Murli!!!

Experts beilieve that this guy can even turn the ball on glass. Because he spins the ball in a way which doesnt need help from the pitch to turn. He turns the ball with his wrist only.
Just look at his record, his bowling average, strike rate, no. of 5 wkt hauls. You will get ur answer :D

He's the real magician. Those who call them a chucker r totally wrong, its true when u look at his action, it seems he is chucking but thats not true, he bends his wrist within 15 degrees limit let by the ICC. If he was a chucker then he would have been banned by the ICC. Isnt it??

2007-04-23 11:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by ur_max 2 · 0 0

It is much easier to bowl to new batsman then the openers who have got their eyes in but perhaps they dont play spin as well.

I do agree warne has more competition for wickets
but murali is the better bowler.

Murali has so much more variation, very few bowlers in the world can bowl the doosra, he basically invented the delivery. Great batsmen look average playing it. The next best thing off spinners have is the arm bowl and that doesn't compare

Back in the day warnes flipper was great it skidded, went straight on and was hard to pick but he wasnt able to bowl it in the last 12 years of his career. Warnes inability to bowl a great wrongun also costs him.

The slider is alright but not as good as the doosra

2007-04-23 11:11:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Being an Australian and with a natural flair for tall talk Warne was much of a character on & off the cricket field. No doubt he was a good bowler but he(according to me) enjoyed favourable home umpiring for most of the time. Against Asian countries he was a failure. Murali is a craftsman. The way he is bowling I don't think anyone can even imitate him for even for one over. Moreover he lets his cricket do the talking and even when he was humiliated by the Aussie PM he chose only to decline to tour the country for matches and didn't complain much. Moreover he is a jovial character and he is also the Brand Ambassador of one organisation under UN. Murali, according to me is the best.

2007-04-23 09:06:25 · answer #4 · answered by Bulty 3 · 1 0

Though Warne holds the record for most wickets in Test Cricket, I consider M. Muralitharan as the best bowler as he he has better economy rate than Warne and has taken more wickets in one day cricket as compared to Warne. Further he has played lesss number of test matches as compared to Warne and by the time he plays the same number of tests Warne has played, he will defenitely take more wickets than Warne.

2007-04-23 10:21:54 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1 0

Though wornie is the best Legie,
murali in both ODI & TESTS a great achiever.
both are artistic to watch in action though Wornei retired.
We only have Murali now to watch batsman R bambooseled.
We miss Shane in this world cup.
i wish both were there when they meet in FINALS.

2007-04-23 12:54:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Murali is the best. Anyway, no matter how well you play and how good your spirit is, there will always be someone to critisize you ( like calling murali a chucker) simply because everybody wants to win (even if it means by taking drugs).

2007-04-23 09:13:44 · answer #7 · answered by Peach 2 · 0 0

Murali doesn't talk much. Shane often passes comments on murali and other bowlers and of course the reply was given not by murali, but by their captains. and murali prove it in field.
Against Asian (who are good players of spin), Murali has more wickets and Warne doesn't have.

2007-04-23 08:46:14 · answer #8 · answered by tdrajagopal 6 · 2 0

no doubt , SHANE WARNE .
If u have seen him playing , he is a real magician . No one can spin the ball more than he does . murli is also great but he plays most of matches with weaker nations while shanewarne had to play against top batsmans.Don't forget Ashes series, this year he had the greatest farewell of all time with 5-0 win.

2007-04-23 09:14:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Shane Warne :- Shane warne actual bowler with no wrist test or bowling action problems . he is genuine spineer .....

2nd is Saqlian Mustaq is also great bowler of spin

2007-04-23 08:19:17 · answer #10 · answered by Don 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers