Freedom of Speech VS Libel?

Question

Do we truly have freedom of speech when you can get sued (rather easily) for what you say?

I'm not talking about stuff like racism and the like, more on intelligent criticism and comments (esp aganist govt figures and policies)

Answer 1

Your freedom of speech is just that free.Though the words you choose to use can come with a consequence.When your words unduly bring harm to another you still have the freedom to say the words.Though it doesn't mean you won't be held accountable for them.
People seldom get sued over intelligent debate.Voicing your opinion on Governmental issues is a freedom all should have.Though choosing the right words will keep you out of the crap.I don't see how libel can be placed upon an opinion of a Government nor the policies it inflicts.

Answer 2

Is it freedom of speech for me to spread rumors that my neighbor is a pedophile , just to cause him some embarrassment since we are not friends?

Of course he can argue & provide evidence to the contrary, but haven't I just destroyed his reputation w my "freedom of speech"?

Freedom of speech has never inferred the right to say anything , anytime , anywhere , about anyone! There are responsibilities which go along w our freedoms. Somehow those responsibilities have not been understood by many of my fellow citizens, & they choose to blame the government for usurping their constitutional rights (however contrived their view of those rights may be!!)

Answer 3

Freedom of speech must be respected and libel must not be used to limit it because it is the only way that people could criticize the government and erroneous legislation.

Answer 4

human beings might desire to overview to tell apart a faith from a subculture. as an occasion there are particular cultures that have traditionally had the legal custom of england and western europe of harmless till shown in charge and in lots of places interior the international that approach is foreign places and new. A legal custom is a huge factor on government function and not purely faith. you apart from mght produce different factors like tribal and ethnic rule that determines that kind of values handed all the way down to the subsequent era. There additionally are international locations that are traditionally Christian like the former soviet satellites in eastern europe yet they have wonderful problems in being democracies no longer because of the fact they are Christian or eastern Orthodox, yet because of the former Communist social gathering gadget they have been used to and additionally because of the fact they went from being an agrarian society in the previous communism took carry to attempting to be a completely industrialized usa in cutting-side cases, and that's a technique that takes hundreds of years and not 50 years for some international locations. So do no longer say Islam is incompatible with Democracy because of the fact there are a number of different factors in touch while it is composed of democracy having synergy with human beings. yet Islam is punctiliously incompatible with Communism on condition that Marx abhors faith and it incredibly is incompatible with Capitalism on condition that capitalism is per organic revenue and hobbies, which usury is something forbidden in Islam. yet in spite of this financial structures is yet another factor that makes a difference. desire all of this helps a number of you individuals comprehend that isn't purely one reason to each subject/answer.

Answer 5

both is important, balance in society.